Monumental in both scale and running time, it's still one of the most spectacular undertakings in film ever seen.
Intolerance (1916)
Runtime: 3 hrs 28 mins
Synopsis: Silent film director D.W. Griffith's biggest, most ambitious spectacle uses stories from different times and places to illustrate humanity's intolerance of religious differences throughout the ages. The most visually impressive of these chronicles is the fall of Babylon, for which... Silent film director D.W. Griffith's biggest, most ambitious spectacle uses stories from different times and places to illustrate humanity's intolerance of religious differences throughout the ages. The most visually impressive of these chronicles is the fall of Babylon, for which Griffith built the largest sets in Hollywood and filled them with thousands of extras; there's also Christ's crucifixion and the massacre of the Heugenots in 15th century France. The most emotionally involving tale is the "modern" one, about a poor girl (Mae Marsh) whose life is repeatedly ruined by the zealotry of social reformers. The image of a mother (Lillian Gish) rocking her child in a cradle ("the uniter of the here and hereafter") links the stories. At one point, angels reach down from heaven to stop soldiers in midbattle, making it clear that Griffith intended this follow-up to THE BIRTH OF A NATION as a message of global peace and love (and an answer to his critics' accusations of racism). For a nation poised to enter World War I, this was perhaps the wrong message, and INTOLERANCE opened to mixed reviews and poor attendance. It is now rightly recognized as a unique work of cinematic art. The restored version includes color-tinted scenes. [More]
Genre: Dramas
Starring: Robert Harron, Mae Marsh, Constance Talmadge, Elmo Lincoln, Eugene Pallette
Screenwriter: Tod Browning
Composer: Carl Davis, Joseph Carl Breil, D.W. Griffith
Producer: D.W. Griffith
Screenwriter: D.W. Griffith
Reviews
Intolerance reflects much credit to the wizard director, for it required no small amount of genuine art to consistently blend actors, horses, monkeys, geese, doves, acrobats and ballets into a composite presentation of a film classic.
Intolerance's sets, costumes, compositions, and mass deployment of bodies in motion are often impressive, especially in the battle of Babylon sequence.
The verdict Intolerance renders in the controversy concerning its maker is that he is a real wizard of lens and screen.
The film presents its stories on the grandest of scales, sparing no expense in re-creating the period, and especially the monstrous Babylonian sets.
The greatest spectacle of the silent era, and an audacious storytelling experiment decades ahead of its time stunning but flawed, alternately dazzling and trying.
Over-extended and powered by a glib conceit, but still a stunning piece of filmmaking, with a breathtaking set.
Surprisingly, as a visual spectacle this very old film stands up well.
As a concept and a milestone of film, its greatness is undeniable.
One can't help but feel that two of the stories would stand better on their own.
One of the great breakthroughs -- the Ulysses of the cinema -- and a powerful, moving experience in its own right.
Related Forums
by: supernothingmanX 9/30/01
News
posted by Scott Weinberg June 22, 2007
Ten years ago the AFI gave us a list of the Top 100 American Films Ever Made -- and when that was done they churned out 15...


Top Critic