Hitchcock probably wouldn't tell this story if he was making films today, and he certainly wouldn't tell it this way, with internal 'voices', back projection, minimal nudity and violence.
Comment
02/09/06
Psycho (1998)
33
%
Tomatometer
How does the Tomatometer work 
Reviews Counted:69
Fresh:23
Rotten:46
Average Rating:5/10
Consensus: Van Sant's pointless remake neither improves or illuminates Hitchcock's original.
Runtime: 2 hrs
Genre: Horror/Suspense
Synopsis: A remake of director Alfred Hitchcock's 1960 thriller about a young woman, who, while on the run after stealing $40,000 from her boss, is brutally murdered in the shower of a motel she is staying... [More]
Starring: Vince Vaughn, Anne Heche, William H. Macy, Julianne Moore
Director: Gus Van Sant
Reviews for Psycho
Top CriticWith the vibrant colour photography, we find ourselves getting caught up in the style, and so instead of atmosphere being added, all that happens is attention being detracted. Perhaps they should have recreated the period of the original film.
01/01/00
Already my mother and I mourn the day when some AVID editor will dare to digitally tweak Vertigo, spinning it into a virtual romantic comedy starring computer-directed replicas of Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan.
08/21/09
Contains nothing to outrage or offend partisans of the original, yet neither does it stand to add much to their appreciation.
03/26/09
Top Critic...the Hitchcock film relied for its effects on originality and creativity. Van Sant's remake substitutes rote repetition and cliches that have long since lost their value.
09/16/08
Psycho doesn't do much for Van Sant, and he doesn't do much for Psycho.
09/22/07
Vaughn's Norman Bates is much inferior because he lacks the natural neurosis of Anthony Perkins.
08/13/07
Deserves closer consideration than it received.
05/26/06
The movie doesn't stink. The performances are good, potentially great, especially Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates, but he owns a scene just for doing that psychotic giggle of his.
12/06/05
A lot of people may not get the point of recreating a work such as Psycho. I didn't get it, until I saw the film.
04/09/05
Personally, I found the remake weaker than the original (which was only vaguely interesting anyway; then again, it's pretty much the same movie).
04/02/05
To my absolute astonishment, I enjoyed the remake more than the original.
01/09/04
franky it sucks
01/07/04
Gus Vant Sant has remade Alfred Hitchcock's classic slasher film with so much reverence and so little originality that it is not clear what the point is.
05/20/03
It's surprising to note that this film, mostly well-acted, is somewhat lacking on the technical side, which is what Hollywood usually does best these days.
02/08/03
A Psycho that functions perfectly on its own terms while polishing this jewel of a thriller into its own bright new gleam.
01/10/03
Predictably, it's (almost) the exact same film, but I wouldn't say that it's a pointless enterprise.
09/10/02
No review available.
07/12/02
It's not so much that this movie didn't need to be made. The real tragedy is that a group of enormously talented people wasted several months of their lives when together they could have done something fresh and exciting and original.
06/05/02
Gus Van Sant assumiu um trabalho ingrato: quando as cenas funcionam, em seu filme, a responsabilidade é de Hitchcock. Quando falham, a culpa é sua.
05/31/02
What’s Hot On RT
Other News
Fresh Links
Featured
RT on YouTube 
Subscribe to RT's YouTube channel and don't miss a second of our cracking video content.
RT on Twitter
Follow Rotten Tomatoes and join us as we tweet about the week's releases.
IGN RSS Feeds