Bigger, better and more sophisticated than the first outing.
Batman Returns (1992)
Runtime: 2 hrs 6 mins
Synopsis: In director Tim Burton's sequel to his successful BATMAN (1989), the Caped Crusador (Michael Keaton) is pitted against the demented, ravenous Penguin (Danny DeVito), a pitiful, orphaned psychopathic freak who once went on a baby-killing spree, and a "power" hungry capitalist villain Max... In director Tim Burton's sequel to his successful BATMAN (1989), the Caped Crusador (Michael Keaton) is pitted against the demented, ravenous Penguin (Danny DeVito), a pitiful, orphaned psychopathic freak who once went on a baby-killing spree, and a "power" hungry capitalist villain Max Shreck (Christopher Walken). As the two criminals plot to gain domination over Gotham City, BATMAN must plot to stop them. In the highly stylized BATMAN RETURNS--complete with dark, Gothic architecture and moody lighting--Batman (and his alter-ego Bruce Wayne) is thrown a third enemy, a terrible distraction: Cat Woman (fearlessly and fabulously played by Michelle Pfeiffer). She is the slinky, sharp-clawed alter-ego of Shreck's secretary Selina. Batman must overcome his own dark past, and his present love entanglements, to rid Gotham of it's evil enemies, this time with even more intricately designed sets and tongue-in-cheek humor, making BATMAN RETURNS an action-packed, but darkly fun adventure. [More]
Genre: Science-Fiction/Fantasy
Starring: Michael Keaton, Michelle Pfeiffer, Danny DeVito, Christopher Walken, Michael Gough
Reviews
Bigger, louder, more relentlessly action-packed than its predecessor, Batman Returns batters its audience into submission.
Burton continues to capture the essence of the Batman legend and more importantly his audiences imagination.
O design de produção é inspirado e Keaton busca conferir peso dramático ao herói, mas o roteiro é pedestre e Pingüim jamais se torna um vilão interessante. Por outro lado, a sensualidade de Pfeiffer quase redime o filme. Quase.
More of the same, but nowhere near as good (funny, disturbing, obsessive) as the uneven original, revealing arrested development on every level.
The fights and chases are incoherent and over-the-top, with the result being confusion rather than suspense.
Where Burton's ideas end and those of his collaborators begin is impossible to know, but result is a seamless, utterly consistent universe full of nasty notions about societal deterioration, greed and other base impulses.
This is less of a sequel than reworking of the first film's themes, with greater attention paid to the villains (all colorful and more intriguing than the hero) and more visually inventive set pieces, albeit contained in a less coherent work.
About the only thing it had going for it was Pfeiffer in a catsuit, stiletto heels, with a whip. Wowsers.
The movie in which Tim Burton mostly fixes what he got wrong ... Unfortunately, he also screws up the stuff he got right.
Burton['s] staging is expert, and his character conceptions are distinctive and gratifying.
Related Forums

by: Metafact 6/17
News
posted by July 11, 2008
We've all enjoyed the long parade of trailers for The Dark Knight -- but do you remember the trailers for the earlier...
posted by Scott Weinberg June 02, 2006
Fans of the dark comedy classic known as "Heathers" should be pleased to learn that screenwriter Daniel...
posted by Jen Yamato January 03, 2006
Character actor Vincent Schiavelli, the long-faced veteran of over 150 film and television appearances, died of lung...
posted by Scott Weinberg August 16, 2005
Stax over at IGN Filmforce has scored a nifty little exclusive that may prove interesting to you "X-Man"...


Top Critic