IGN.com|AskMen.com|Rotten Tomatoes|GameSpy|FilePlanet|TeamXbox|CheatsCodesGuides|GameStats|Direct2Drive

RottenTomatoes.com

Register | Log In | What is RT?
It's our 10th birthday, so you get presents!
Home Movies DVD Celebrities News Critics Photos & Trailers The Vine Forums
Features | Columns | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
 
RT News / interview
Interview: Picking Up on William Friedkin's Cruising
by Tom Toro
Blog Article | Discuss Article
Page | 1 2 3 4
1980 seemed to be a transitional moment when there was still a lingering sense of all-inclusiveness and acceptance from the 1960s and 1970s and people felt free to be very liberal, and yet there also seemed to be an encroaching sense that philosophy could be prayed upon to make people vulnerable.

WF: Cruising definitely reflected the attitude of the times: The temper of the times. How the culture was either accepted or ignored, at that particular time, and then attention would be brought on it because of this or that event, like the murders. But what was happening during the time we were making the film, there were all of these gay people dying and it wasn't clear why. There was a "gay disease". And it was the beginning of AIDS, but those were considered unsolved deaths at the time. Shortly after, maybe by the mid-1980s, the largest group of AIDS victims was women in prison. Then they were able to trace it to needles, and the exchange of needles, either for transfusions or drugs. But at first it was thought to be a plague that struck only gay people. And so, again, it was a series of unsolved murders. Unsolved killings: Why, all of a sudden? I had many friends who were contracting AIDS, and many of them were not outwardly gay. It's hard to underestimate how paranoid people became with the onset of AIDS.

The sense of suspicion comes through in the movie. And in the middle of it, you interject this character of Steve Burns (Al Pacino). You put this guy in the middle of all these shifting identities, hidden identities that conceal potential danger, and his own identity starts to shift. He starts to question his own sexual orientation. Could you talk about how you found that character with Pacino?

WF: Steve Burns is based on a guy who went through that; a police officer named Randy Jurgensen. He [Jurgensen] plays a detective in the movie, in the morgue scene and in the interrogations. He was also in The French Connection. He had a 20-year career as a New York City detective. He was involved in the periphery of the actual French Connection case, and the murders in the Harlem mosque, and he had a number of extraordinary cases. He was sent into the leather bars, which were at that time subterranean, because there was a series of killings where the victims all had a similar appearance, and they looked like Randy; about his height, dark hair, mustache, swarthy complexion. The police had no clues and basically threw up their hands.




Randy was sent in to try and attract the killer. These were his experiences, much more so than anything that's in Gerald Walker's book, Cruising. I used the basic foundation from that book, but his book is not set in the leather bars. Randy's life was. He went through that. He told me how he became disoriented and confused as a result of that experience. Because you're dealing with basic human needs, sexual and emotional, quite apart from whatever sort of religious or moral or social or ethical rules we're given, you're dealing with life at its most primitive level. Randy was in there to do the job of a police officer, and he had no idea what in the hell he should be doing. But he was being held out there as bait for a killer. So it was Randy's very vivid descriptions of his life during this period that formed the basis of Cruising.

The description of the killer that Burns was given is equivalent to the modern "black male between 18 and 30, between 5'5'' and 6'5''", which is so general it's practically useless. So he does have to put himself out there; he has to be very open, but suspicious at the same time.

WF: It's fear. He wasn't allowed to carry a gun. He was afraid. As with all undercover police work, you're asked to be an actor: A convincing actor. A handful of them were [convincing actors], and those were the guys we made movies about. Most of the undercover detectives cracked under the tension or emotion distress of being thought of for 20 years as part of this or that Mafia outfit. Most of that went very badly for the guys who did it, because they weren't actors.

To succeed, you have to give yourself over to the farce so completely that you're at risk of truly becoming the role.

WF: Yes, exactly. Of course, the very best cops are the ones who think like criminals anyway, who could have gone either way.

That theme of play-acting as a policeman is made explicit in the ironic scene when Pacino shows up to "Precinct Night" at the local leather bar, and he's the only one who's not dressed as a cop, so he gets kicked out, even though he's the only one there who's actually a cop.

WF: There was "Precinct Night" where everyone had to dress up as a cop. And it was interesting because the bars in New York were owned at that time by two groups: the Mafia and cops. Sometimes working cops, but sometimes ex-cops who made so much money that they retired. The police that were supposedly out there for protection were actually owners of the clubs where these crimes were originating.

Next Page >>
Bookmark and Share
Page | 1 2 3 4
Comments (1-20 of 55 posts) | Reply
Void Moon writes:
on Sep 14 2007 06:53 PM

Friedkin hasn't made a good movie in 30 years.

Talk about falling off.



(Reply to this)
Jen Yamato writes:
on Sep 14 2007 07:08 PM

Geez, way to be the most negative human being on the planet. Even with a spotty filmography, the man made The French f***ing Connection and The Exorcist.

(Reply to this)
382953
lostharvestmovie writes:
on Sep 14 2007 07:41 PM

maybe Friedkin hasn't made a great movie in 30 years but let's see: "to live and die in la" is pretty cool and that was made in '83 or '84; i remember thinking "jade" was pretty good and "the hunted" was a really neat movie and "the hunted" is fairly recent.... the 1980s were not really a Freidkin type of decade anyways... I remember sitting in the theaters in the 1980s and just wishing for the kinds of '70s films that Friedkin was making.... Friedkin is a pretty cool filmmaker.

www.lostharvest.com



(Reply to this)
Bruce Campbell writes:
on Sep 14 2007 07:55 PM

In reply to this comment (#1124204)
You've never made a good film.

(Reply to this)
Void Moon writes:
on Sep 14 2007 09:17 PM

Listen....do you hear that???

Sounds like a bunch of babies crying.....waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa............


(Reply to this)
monkeyonaspring writes:
on Sep 15 2007 09:07 AM

In reply to this comment (#1124461)
Using a baby crying simile for an insult is more commonly employed by children. If you are going to make a come-back make it intelligent, please...

(Reply to this)
Bruce Campbell writes:
on Sep 15 2007 10:24 AM

In reply to this comment (#1124461)
Enough from you, son.

(Reply to this)
330385
Loserman writes:
on Sep 15 2007 11:04 AM

To proclaim Friedkin hasn't done a good movie in 30 years is a proclamation of your own unawareness. While Friedkin's filmography isn't miles long, what it does encompass is a variety of provocatives. Sure, his modern stuff may not match up to his earlier promise, but there are inklings of it throughout. I thought Bug was very effective, probably his most consistent film since To Live And Die In L.A., an unsung '80s film (one of the few gritty ones from the Reagan years). I think someone needs his diaper changed.

(Reply to this)
Void Moon writes:
on Sep 15 2007 11:35 AM

In reply to this comment (#1124967)
O....I'm sorry....he hasn't made a good film in 23 years.

My bad.

lol

30 years to 23 years....whatever....the guy is irrelevant.

That's like praising Steven Spielberg if he had only done DUEL and JAWS (late 70's) and then didn't do anything since then.

The guy's not exactly kicking over in his grave....so why don't he step up to the plate and get on some good scripts again?

You tell me that.

All the interviews I've seen him in he comes off as a pompous, arrogant know-it-all.

This, after he hasn't been relevant in 30 years.

Bitter, maybe?


(Reply to this)
330385
Loserman writes:
on Sep 15 2007 01:02 PM

In reply to this comment (#1125007)
Who's bitter exactly? For whatever reason, you came out of the gates swinging at Friedkin. Did you discover authenticity issues with the leather bar scenes in "Cruising" or something?

Aside from box office receipts, has Spielberg really done anything as good as Duel or Jaws?

And, in all seriousness, do you think any of the serious dramas of the 1970s would be greenlit in today's commercial film market? Friedkin and many other directors from the bygone days could be sitting on some good scripts and just can't receive the time of day because of the newbies who control the purse strings in Hollywood. When lauded filmmakers such as Herzog, Lynch, Scorsese, Allen, etc., struggle today to get financial backing for their films, something ain't right. Does that make them irrelevant too?

Your associating Friedkin to being pompous, arrogant and a know-it-all says more about you than him. Why is sharing knowledge a detriment? Yep, thinking and learning are so 20th Century. At least his knowledge base is deeper and more broad than most directors', which is typically based upon bad television shows from the last 10 years. So, yes, you've made it clear you don't like the guy. Some of us wish Friedkin could be given more opportunities to express himself through cinema. Why the scorched earth vitriol?


(Reply to this)
Void Moon writes:
on Sep 15 2007 02:32 PM

Hmmm.....Spielberg has done little movies like Schindler's List and Saving Private Ryan, etc.

Have you heard of them? : )

And how does Scorses struggle to get financial backing? Ever see a movie called The Gangs of New York (and its monumental sets of old New York), as well as The Aviator?

Herzog is underrated and doesn't get the respect he deserves, but that doesn't stop him from making quality projects, no matter the financial backing, year after year.

And I never said I didn't like the guy.

It's called stating facts.

Look up the word: Fact(s)

The equation = you make a decent movie, you'll almost 99% of the time get financial backing of a sort.

I'm just amazed at the utter lack of knowledgable posters on here who actually know film history (and it shows in the posts above, concerning Scorsese, etc.).

Consider yourself served, sir.



(Reply to this)
Bruce Campbell writes:
on Sep 15 2007 03:16 PM

There are billions of people on this planet.

Only a few will ever make a great film.
Even fewer will ever make a horror masterpiece like 'The Exorcist'.
Even fewer will ever make an additional three great films.

The great 12 Angry Men remake, directed by sir William Friedkin was made only 10 years ago. Not 30.

The man has made four great films. Most people struggle to make one. The man has earned atleast some respect.


(Reply to this)
Void Moon writes:
on Sep 15 2007 03:55 PM

In reply to this comment (#1125582)
Very true, Bruce.

He does deserve respect.

I'll get him credit where credit is do.


Read my first post--all I wrote was: "Friedkin hasn't made a good movie in 30 years. Talk about falling off."

And that was a statement of fact.

It can't be denied.




(Reply to this)
Bruce Campbell writes:
on Sep 15 2007 04:14 PM

12 Angry Men.

All I'm saying.


(Reply to this)
Void Moon writes:
on Sep 15 2007 04:58 PM

12 Angry Men was a freaking television movie remake of Sidney Lumet's classic 12 ANGRY MEN (Henry Fonda).

It wasn't even an original piece. It was Lumet's classic filmed for 1997 TV.

Get your facts straight.

My god.


(Reply to this)
Bruce Campbell writes:
on Sep 15 2007 05:17 PM

It was great remake though.

So... What's your point? Are you saying no (TV) remake can be good?


(Reply to this)
Void Moon writes:
on Sep 15 2007 05:36 PM

It's basically exactly like the remake of Hitchcock's classic, Psycho, which came out in 1998 starring Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates.

It used the exact same script (and even imitated the original in camera-flow and shot sequences).

It wasn't original, and it's far from creative.

Friedkin took the script from Lumet's classic and made it into a direct-to-television remake.

Thing is, the Psycho remake (1998) sucked, but the tv movie 12 Angry Men (1997) remake was watchable.

My beef with not crediting Friedkin for it is:

#1-It wasn't original
#2-Same script
#3-Tv movie

And #3 sets it in motion.

It's a TV movie.

Should I care that Quentin Tarantino wrote AND directed a two-hour long episode of CSI?

Yes. It was decent.

But it was still just TV (though more original than a remake) and SHOULD NOT be equated with ANY of his film work (Pulp Fiction, etc.).

Though TV and film have many ties and relations (think about all the mini-movie episodes of shows like THE SOPRANOS, etc.), they are still two different mediums.

Copy? : )


(Reply to this)
Bruce Campbell writes:
on Sep 15 2007 05:42 PM

Wow... You are picky.

Or were you just looking for a loophole?


(Reply to this)
Void Moon writes:
on Sep 15 2007 05:45 PM

In reply to this comment (#1126244)
Haha...nah, I'm not picky, I just actually know what I'm talking about, compared to others around here.......

Any experienced filmmaker will tell you the same thing. Go ask.

Btw, I think all that baby crying finally died down....





(Reply to this)
Bruce Campbell writes:
on Sep 15 2007 05:55 PM

I am an experienced filmmaker though.

I did direct classics like 'Man with the Screaming Brain' and 'Fanalysis' afterall.


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2 3
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.
Related Links
Cruising
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum
Related Articles
  • Interview: Picking Up on William Friedkin's Cruising 55
Most Discussed
  • Holy Box-Office, Batman! Dark Knight Makes $66M On Record-Breaking Opening Day 147
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Kapow! The Bat Slams The Box Office 75
  • Watching the Watchmen Trailer: A Detailed Analysis 35
  • High-Res Images: Rose McGowan as Red Sonja 31
  • XXX3 to Revive Vin Diesel 26
  • Transformers 2 Scribe Sets Record Straight 21
  • RT Photo Preview: What To Watch at Comic-Con 20
  • Further Reading: Dark Knight is Unforgettable, but Who Remembers James Batman? 18
  • Hugh Jackman Premieres Wolverine Footage at Comic-Con 18
  • Clone Wars Series Details Revealed 16
Latest News
  • Say Hi to RT Editors at Comic-Con and Get Swag! 1
  • Weekly Ketchup: Anchorman 2, Dracula: Year Zero, Twilight Zone and Much More 11
  • Review Revue: Step Brothers Take on The X-Files 5
  • High-Res Images: Rose McGowan as Red Sonja 31
  • Twilight Fans Storm Comic-Con, Rewarded With Extended Vampire Fight Scene 8
  • Watching the Watchmen Trailer: A Detailed Analysis 35
  • Critics Consensus: File The X-Files Under "Disappointing" 13
  • Hugh Jackman Premieres Wolverine Footage at Comic-Con 18
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Step Brothers and X-Files Hope For the Best 6
  • RT Photo Preview: What To Watch at Comic-Con 20
Latest Interviews
  • RT Interview: Ben Barnes on Taking on the Journey of Prince Caspian 0
  • RT Interview: William Moseley on His Last Narnia Adventure in Prince Caspian 2
  • RT Interview: Jack Black on Kung Fu Panda 6
  • RT Interview: Skandar Keynes on the Action Challenge of Prince Caspian 1
  • RT Interview: Anna Popplewell on a Different Side to Narnia in Prince Caspian 10
  • RT Interview: Keira Knightley on Welsh Accents and Life After Pirates 15
  • RT Interview: Sienna Miller on Dylan Thomas, G.I. Joe and Nottingham 2
  • RT Interview: Ben Affleck Goes After the Critics for a Change 34
  • Interview: Uwe Boll Talks Postal, Kevin Costner, and Answers Reader Mail 44
  • RT Interview: Joan Cusack on War, Inc., the Unofficial Sequel to Grosse Point Blank 6
Latest Features
  • Watching the Watchmen Trailer: A Detailed Analysis 35
  • Exclusive: Ben Burtt's WALL-E Sound Masterclass 1
  • Exclusive: The Storyboards of WALL-E 6
  • Exclusive: The World of WALL-E 10
  • Exclusive: Inside Pixar - A Photo Tour 14
  • Exclusive: Pixar's and Stars' Favourite WALL-E Moments 23
  • Guillermo del Toro - RT's Dinner and the Movies Interview 28
  • Edinburgh 2008: What to Watch 6
  • Total Recall: The 25 Best Action Heroines of All Time 125
  • Exclusive: Hellboy II Edit Suite Visit and Concept Art 7


About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Celebs List| Newsletter

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | ModCenter | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2008, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.