Critical Consensus: Mangy "Dog," Rom-Com "Failure," Evil "Eye"
This week's wide releases include a pair of remakes for very different demographics ("The Shaggy Dog" and "The Hills Have Eyes"), and a romantic comedy ("Failure to Launch"). What will the critics say?
"The Shaggy Dog" is a remake of the 1959 Fred MacMurray family comedy. This one stars Tim Allen as a district attorney who is accidentally injected with a chemical that periodically turns him into a dog; family togetherness ensues. Critics say this family fare is not sharp on its own modest terms, and despite some decent moments (many of them courtesy of Robert Downey Jr.), it lacks, ahem, bite. At 36 percent on the Tomatometer, this "Dog" could use a trip to the vet; it's not as healthy as the original, which stands at 75 percent.
Listen up, Hollywood, because I'm only going to say this once. Don't you know that you're asking for trouble from movie critics if you put negative descriptors in your title? It's like a red cape in front of a charging bull. "Failure to Launch," starring Matthew McConaughey and Sarah Jessica Parker, tells the story of a regular 30-something dude whose parents want him to move out, so they hire a woman to try to go on a date with him. Scribes say the leads have an acceptable level of chemistry, and that the film benefits from quirky supporting players, particularly Zooey Deschanel. But they hasten to add that the title is a bit too apt, for the setup and the script are too contrived for the material to really achieve liftoff. At 34 percent on the Tomatometer, this one's a... never mind.
Wes Craven's "The Hills Have Eyes" gets the remake treatment from Alexander Aja, the director behind the recent slasher fave "High Tension." The film tells the story of a family road trip that comes to an abrupt halt, thanks to a clan of bloodthirsty genetic mutants. Critics say it's a pretty gruesome experience, and one of the better horror remakes of recent years; whether those are compliments depends on your taste. At 53 percent on the Tomatometer, this one's a slight notch below the original (63 percent).
Recent Matthew McConaughey Movies:
------------------------------------------------
20% -- Two For the Money (2005)
86% -- Magnificent Desolation: Walking on the Moon 3-D (2005)
38% -- Sahara (2005)
19% -- Paparazzi (2004)
42% -- How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days (2003)
"The Shaggy Dog" is a remake of the 1959 Fred MacMurray family comedy. This one stars Tim Allen as a district attorney who is accidentally injected with a chemical that periodically turns him into a dog; family togetherness ensues. Critics say this family fare is not sharp on its own modest terms, and despite some decent moments (many of them courtesy of Robert Downey Jr.), it lacks, ahem, bite. At 36 percent on the Tomatometer, this "Dog" could use a trip to the vet; it's not as healthy as the original, which stands at 75 percent.
Listen up, Hollywood, because I'm only going to say this once. Don't you know that you're asking for trouble from movie critics if you put negative descriptors in your title? It's like a red cape in front of a charging bull. "Failure to Launch," starring Matthew McConaughey and Sarah Jessica Parker, tells the story of a regular 30-something dude whose parents want him to move out, so they hire a woman to try to go on a date with him. Scribes say the leads have an acceptable level of chemistry, and that the film benefits from quirky supporting players, particularly Zooey Deschanel. But they hasten to add that the title is a bit too apt, for the setup and the script are too contrived for the material to really achieve liftoff. At 34 percent on the Tomatometer, this one's a... never mind.
Wes Craven's "The Hills Have Eyes" gets the remake treatment from Alexander Aja, the director behind the recent slasher fave "High Tension." The film tells the story of a family road trip that comes to an abrupt halt, thanks to a clan of bloodthirsty genetic mutants. Critics say it's a pretty gruesome experience, and one of the better horror remakes of recent years; whether those are compliments depends on your taste. At 53 percent on the Tomatometer, this one's a slight notch below the original (63 percent).
Recent Matthew McConaughey Movies:
------------------------------------------------
20% -- Two For the Money (2005)
86% -- Magnificent Desolation: Walking on the Moon 3-D (2005)
38% -- Sahara (2005)
19% -- Paparazzi (2004)
42% -- How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days (2003)
Related Items
|
VML writes: on Mar 09 2006 07:51 PM ...and that's why supporting actors/actresses are having the best week ever! (Reply to this) |
|
AlienSeed writes: on Mar 09 2006 11:15 PM Just saw Hills have Eyes and...wow....Aja loves the gore. I really enjoyed this movie, and found it to be much better than the original. For most of the film, it's merely a modern update of the first one, the scenes and even alot of the dialogue is the same, its just 100 times more graphic. A couple minor details are changed here and there, and in some places, it seems like something was cut from this version....probably was since this was supposedly given the NC-17 rating originally for being Too explicit. Then during the third act, Aja really lets loose with his own material, completely new to the "Hills" story, and very disturbing. This was one of the changes I especially liked, along with the changing of the "family's" origin and their appearances. I can't remember if there was anything nuclear involved with the family's creation in the original, if there was it was only hinted at briefly...in this film, the nuclear effects are displayed full on. If you're a fan of the original, this one's a definite must see, in my opinion, it takes most of what was wrong with the first and fixes it...then pours a bucket of blood on it for color. (Reply to this) |
|
lancerbird13 writes: on Mar 10 2006 11:35 AM Glad to see that "Hills" is getting some decent reviews...im going to see it sometime this weekend...it looks to be a very well-made horror remake.. (Reply to this) |
|
pota1967 writes: on Mar 12 2006 12:38 PM [b]Hard To Believe[/b] that Failure To Launch made 24 million (Reply to this) |
|
mizzoucritic writes: on Mar 12 2006 09:18 PM In reply to this comment (#832007) [b]I Concur![/b] How could so many people make the mistake of seeing Failure to Launch? Doesn't Matthew Mac-whatever the hell your name is in a romantic comedy spell disaster? I bet it was the dating crowd. I guess this is the math: Lady from "Sex and the City" + dude from "Sexiest Men Alive" = $$$. Bet it drops 60 percent of its gross next weekend. (Reply to this) |
|
D79 writes: on Mar 13 2006 09:39 AM i too saw the hills this past weekend & i totally agree with the the first post. it starts off a bit slow but once it gets going it doesnt stop. one of best horror movies i've seen in quite some time. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |





