
RT Obscura, a new bi-weekly column by renowned critic Kim Newman, sees the writer plumbing the depths of the Rotten Tomatoes archive in search of some forgotten gems. In his third column, Kim looks at David Hasselhoff's crowning achievement of 2001: Jekyll and Hyde: The Musical.
Jekyll &
Hyde: The Musical from 2001 is an awkward hybrid -- not only in its
genre (horror musical) but its format (telerecorded Broadway performance).
These things used to be more common on UK TV, where Brian Rix farces or operas
were broadcast live or as live from theatres; now we have a paradoxical
situation whereby the technology exists to record - easily and cheaply - even
high school productions. But there's little audience interest in sitting through
the results, which always fail to capture the immediacy of theatre and seem
hobbled and hectoring next to a proper TV show or film.
This lengthy (134 minutes) transcription of a Broadway performance has played on
US cable, and is
available on DVD. Interesting to
R.L.
Stevenson completists (I own up here) and the legion of
David
Hasselhoff fans we're told exist in Germany, it might prove a
long haul for everyone else.

I've not seen the 1973 Kirk Douglas/Lionel Bart TV movie musical Jekyll & Hyde, but it hasn't much of a rep; this lengthy effort from the writer-composer team of Leslie Bricusse and Frank Wildborn tries to mount the oft-told tale as a big-emoting, often-sungspieled musical melodrama, inclining more towards the coach party Lez Miz/Phantom end of the spectrum rather than the heights of Sondheim's Sweeney Todd. It starts as if it were more closely based on the Reuben Mamoulian film than the novel, with Henry Jekyll (his motivation is a mad father who barely registers) rejected by a stuffy committee when he petitions funds for his experiments and going through a lavish engagement party with spirited Emma Carewe (Andrea Rivette), daughter of dignified Sir Danvers (Hammer's old Robin Hood, Barrie Ingham).
Jekyll's friend Utterson (who, in typical Broadway colour-blind casting, is black, George Merritt) takes him to the Red Rat music hall-cum-brothel in the East End, where they watch the cavortings of dancer Lucy (a corsetted Coleen Sexton), who sings a song about evil which inspires further experiments in laboratory and boudoir. At the end of the long first act, Jekyll drinks the potion and transforms. As Hyde, Hasselhoff undoes his pony-tail and grins through scraggy hair: no make-up effects are used, not even of the Richard Mansfield type, though Hasselhoff modifies his singing style (of course, the usual Hyde gimmick of gruesome false teeth isn't possible in a show that depends on the songs).

The plot gets a bit wonky in the middle of the evening, with the expected Hyde-Lucy business mostly taking place offstage and a surprising body-count as Hyde gleefully murders the hypocrites (a whoremongering bishop, etc) who turned down Jekyll's grant application (in a possible footnote to the theme of duality, some of the supporting cast play dual roles as pillars of society and criminal scum).
The finale comes at Jekyll's wedding, with a transformation mid-ceremony and Utterson putting an end to Hyde with a swordcane-thrust. It has the sort of score which is stirring, bombastic and quite effective without being in the least memorable -- the songs have instantly-forgettable, you're-sure-they've-been-used-before titles like 'Once Upon a Dream', 'This is the Moment' and 'Someone Like You'. The video production means a few swoops across the stage and shots of an applauding audience, and the inclusion of Hasselhoff's 'I've come a long way from the beach and the talking car' curtain call speech. Otherwise, this is content to embalm the show for posterity.
A curiosity.
Related Items
| Movie: | Jekyll & Hyde: The Musical |
| Celeb: | David Hasselhoff |
|
VML writes: on Oct 08 2007 07:05 PM Nice honest review. I heard bad things about it, such as no close ups of Hyde until much later on. Now I know why. (Reply to this) |
|
VML writes: on Oct 08 2007 07:06 PM Nice honest review. I heard bad things about it, such as no close ups of Hyde until much later on. Now I know why. (Reply to this) |
|
BReeG writes: on Oct 08 2007 07:30 PM As someone who just recently read the book, I have to say that I would have little or no interest in seeing a musical version. Interesting to read about though. (Reply to this) |
|
fatstooley writes: on Oct 08 2007 10:45 PM This recording of the play is terrible, mostly because of Hasselhoff's performance. At this point they had also cannibalized the original play, cutting and adding parts that really didn't add to the play. I haven't (seen it in a while) but I believe they cut out one of the best musical number's, "Bring on the Men." If you really want to get a feel for how the play could be done listen to the original cast recordings, they're quite good (Linda Eder has an amazing voice as Lucy). (Reply to this) |
|
dracus writes: on Oct 09 2007 05:43 PM I've seen this movie and felt it was appropriate to be called Jekyll and Hyde because that's just how it played; a movie with two completely different personalities part good, part bad. I briefly wondered after seeing it if that was meant to be part good-part bad in an artsy kind of way then that thought: "Nahhh, the director wasn't that brilliant. It was just a movie that had its good moments and its crappy moments." (Reply to this) |
|
FourthWall writes: on Oct 09 2007 06:05 PM I have the 94 concept cast and 97 broadway cast recordings, and my school is doing it this year (I'm Jekyll). And I own this (as far as torrenting equals owning), and Hasselhoff's ham acting is the only thing that brings this show down in this cast rotation. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |





