This week, Sly
Stallone revives one of his most iconic characters. In
Rambo, John Rambo
is back, after a short twenty year break. Living a solitary life as a
river guide in Thailand, he discovers recent clients have been captured in Burma
and decides to take matters into his own hands and straps the bandana back on.
The Rambo films are now a staple in 80s pop culture, so RT decided to
take a trip back to the 80s, and watch the original three Rambo films for
this week's Total Recall.
I'll be the first
to admit that I'm not the biggest fan of violent movies; in fact, I've somehow
managed to make it this far in life without seeing any of the approximately
4,000 Terminator,
Predator, or
Alien films. The only
Schwarzenegger or Stallone action I've seen has been of the
Stop! or My Mom
Will Shoot or Junior variety, and rather than seeing
Cloverfield
last weekend, you would have caught me at the
27 Dresses
screening. So some of the editors here
at Rotten Tomatoes thought it would be a hoot to give me a Rambo-centric
assignment. This is how, in my mid-twenties, I finally swallowed a time capsule
of the 1980s action phenomenon, and watched all three Rambo films in one
blood-drenched, guerilla warfare-filled weekend.
I began my Rambo-thon
with the first film to feature John Rambo,
First Blood (82 percent on the
Tomatometer). Unlike the plotless bloodbath I was expecting, First Blood
is the tale of a Vietnam War hero who clashes with a small-town cop (played by
Brian Dennehy). The cop -- who clearly has a problem with Vietnam veterans --
spots a drifter (Stallone, natch) walking through his peaceful Oregon town, and
decides to bust him on a bogus charge. Bad move, Dennehy! While being
interrogated and treated like livestock at the station, Rambo has flashbacks of
being abused as a POW in Vietnam, and all hell breaks loose. The remainder of
the film is an exhilarating chase through the primal wildlife of the Pacific
Northwest. Sly has some decent acting chops in the film, with the exception of
his final monologue -- which I needed to watch with subtitles to fully
understand.
Besides being a great "on-the-run" action flick, First Blood dramatizes many issues Vietnam veterans faced upon their return to America. But while actual Vietnam veterans had to fight their own personal wars after returning home, all Rambo needs to take on an entire police force is a ragged tarp and a novelty-sized hunting knife. Critics still hail First Blood today: Phil Villarreal of the Arizona Daily Star says, "Stallone's dogged tale of survival seems so fresh you'd swear it was made last week...except for the sad truth that they don't make 'em like that anymore."
First Blood trailer.
After my surprise
positive reaction to First Blood, I was looking forward to watching
Rambo:
First Blood Part II (26 percent). The movie starts interestingly enough --
Colonel Trautman (Richard Crenna), who trained Rambo, asks him to go to Vietnam
to photograph American POWs -- but after arriving in Vietnam, Rambo realizes that
he's been set up, and vows to rescue the prisoners. Sounds good, right? I
thought so too, until Rambo strangled a rattlesnake in the jungle within the
first 10 minutes of the film. Throughout the jungle scenes, Rambo brutally kills
a lot of animals, shrubbery, and people -- including pirates -- with his eerily
veiny bare hands. I definitely knew the movie was trouble when I noticed Sly's
suspicious muscle gain -- he looks like he devoured a few cases of human growth
hormones before the cameras rolled -- and after a few minutes of dialogue and a
few lame attempts at political discussion, the filmmakers decide to ditch the
ideas and just blow stuff up instead. Filmcritic.com's Jeremiah Kipp agrees."
No
one will ever confuse this for a quality film, that's for sure. It's a macho
fantasy created to convince Americans that we could have won
Vietnam
if only we'd trusted John Rambo." Rambo can do anything in this sequel. It
doesn't matter if hundreds of people are after him; all he needs is his machine
gun. Rambo
was killing so many people at once that it reminded me of Hot Shots. The
problem with the second Rambo is that it takes itself too seriously; if
it had just embraced its cheesiness, it'd have been much more entertaining.
Rambo - First Blood Part II trailer.
After the trash
that was Rambo II, I wasn't looking forward to devoting further hours to
Rambo III (35 percent), but surprisingly, the third installment is a great combination of First Blood's good qualities and the tongue-in-cheek factor that Part II was missing. In Rambo III, we find Stallone living in a monastery,
helping out the monks with his carpentry skills and income from stick-fighting
matches (mmm...cheese). The colonel manages to track Rambo down in Thailand and --
surprise! -- asks him to join his team on a mission in Afghanistan. (It seems that an evil Russian commander is brutalizing a small Afghan village.) Rambo politely declines, since he's busy working on himself, but
quickly changes his mind after learning that Trautman went in and has been
captured. The scenes with Rambo interacting with the Afghan rebels show a softer
side of the action hero, and teach a bit of history about the various Afghan
occupations.
However, once Rambo decides to go in and save Trautman on a solo mission, the film I was expecting all along finally appears. With his bandana tied tight, Rambo shoots hundreds of Russians, defeats helicopters and tanks with a single gun, and manages to get in some great dialogue about being the Soviet commander's "worst nightmare." I especially enjoyed Rambo running through a giant explosion in a cave -- when Colonel Trautman asks how he feels, a burnt Rambo replies, "Well done." Despite some negative reviews -- and the ridiculous plot -- I had a lot of fun watching Rambo III. "Stallone has by now made Rambo parody-proof, since the character is every bit as laughable as he is grandiose; that's part of the fun," wrote Janet Maslin of the New York Times.
Rambo III trailer.
The Rambo films were all entertaining in their own ways, and the violence was fairly predictable, so it was easy for me to close my eyes whenever Rambo was performing self-surgery or slicing someone open. I'm even not- so-secretly excited to see the new Rambo. Here's hoping it combines the political undercurrent of First Blood with the cheesy puns and overall badassness of Rambo III.
Related Items
| Movie: | First Blood |
| Rambo - First Blood Pt. 2 | |
| Rambo III |
|
Synyster_Gates writes: on Jan 23 2008 05:51 PM The only good Rambo film I think is First Blood (Reply to this) |
|
BrianInSD writes: on Jan 23 2008 05:52 PM Has the new movie been screened for critics? It's opening Friday and so far no reviews have been posted. (Reply to this) |
|
Daniel Aaron writes: on Jan 23 2008 05:54 PM First Blood was epic still is Stallone needs to remember that one before he dives in again but it looks like he has not. (Reply to this) |
|
The Senhman writes: on Jan 23 2008 06:11 PM I agree with your assessment of the Rambo movies. First Blood is definitely the best - action-packed, great lines, and efficient. Rambo II is kinda boring on repeat viewings. Rambo III is way over the top, but also very entertaining. (Reply to this) |
|
kenny356 writes: on Jan 23 2008 06:31 PM just wish the first film ended like the book and have trautman kill rambo at the end. It would have made it a better movie. (Reply to this) |
|
PatrickBateman writes: on Jan 23 2008 06:49 PM All 3 movies are awesome. I nod to true fans who can embrace the over the top attitude of the sequels. Hell yea. (Reply to this) |
|
PatrickBateman writes: on Jan 23 2008 06:50 PM All 3 movies are awesome. I nod to true fans who can embrace the over the top attitude of the sequels. Hell yea. (Reply to this) |
|
This is It writes: on Jan 23 2008 07:48 PM Where are the reviews? (Reply to this) |
|
Shatter24 writes: on Jan 23 2008 09:26 PM I thought First Blood was definetly the best, but thought the slight edge went to Rambo II not III. Rambo is much more in his element in the jungle/woods than in the desert. I seemed to remember the second Rambo getting a better reaction than the third Rambo (I'll have to check, but I bet the box office was bigger). PS. Side-note for those who didn't notice, James Cameron (Aliens; Titanic director) co-wrote the second Rambo film. Maybe that's why I kinda dug it. (Reply to this) |
|
LinoBrocka writes: on Jan 24 2008 12:25 AM I think I was about 7 years old when I saw First Blood( I think). All I could remember thinking afterwards was whether or not I can stitch myself up if I fell off a tree or my bike. Rambo is amazing. (Reply to this) |
|
LinoBrocka writes: on Jan 24 2008 12:26 AM I think I was about 7 years old when I saw First Blood( I think). All I could remember thinking afterwards was whether or not I can stitch myself up if I fell off a tree or my bike. Rambo is amazing. (Reply to this) |
|
Don't Tase Me Bro writes: on Jan 24 2008 02:25 AM i reckon he'll kill off his character in this one...any takers? (Reply to this) |
|
Duke322 writes: on Jan 24 2008 05:10 AM How does someone who writes for a film site get away with never seeing Alien, Terminator or Predator...or before this Rambo?! Shame on you! :) (Reply to this) |
|
Mr. Bowler writes: on Jan 24 2008 05:14 AM Though I agree that First Blood is the best, Rambo III has that "so bad it's good" feel. (Reply to this) |
|
Jeyl writes: on Jan 24 2008 07:16 AM Now hold it right there Rachel Sandor. You said: "until Rambo strangled a rattlesnake in the jungle within the first 10 minutes of the film." Rambo did NOT kill the snake in that scene. The snake was sneaking up behind him, he reacted and just let it go. If Rambo had truly killed the snake, it probably would have fallen to the ground rather than maintain it's grip on the branch. It's not in Stallone's character to have animals be hurt in a film. Just read some info on Cliffhanger or listen to his commentary on First Blood about the boar. (Reply to this) |
|
dahluzz writes: on Jan 24 2008 08:05 AM In reply to this comment (#1515172) i agree that there is no excuse for your lack of filmic experience, Rachel Sandor(especially given you job), but nice work on the article. maybe there should be a weekly feature called "Re-educating Rachel" or something, where you have to watch entire series you somehow missed (like terminator or alien) and then discuss how you're slowly but surely becoming less ignorant about movies that don't star kate hudson or katherine heigl. a kind of fish-out-of-water theme. I'm curious to see the reaction to 'Live Free or Die from Rambo.' (Reply to this) |
|
Slipperypick writes: on Jan 24 2008 08:22 AM First Blood was a good flick. Rambo should have died, though, like the book depicted. The other two stripped the character of depth and integrity. Pure crap... If they hadn't featured the character of John Rambo, they would have made good Chuck Norris flicks... Oh wait, they already did. (Reply to this) |
|
Jen Yamato writes: on Jan 24 2008 09:48 AM The new Rambo has indeed been screened for critics - we should see reviews very soon, since most critics are holding them for opening day. But from what I hear from the critics I know who did see it, this one is a freaking bloodbath. Not for the squeamish, or people who don't like to see things like babies being squished and that sort of thing. But baby haters should love it! (Reply to this) |
|
tonysola1000 writes: on Jan 24 2008 10:37 AM AINTITCOOLNEWS.com has a bunch of reviews, one from harry, the rest sent in from folks who caught an early screener. ALL of them say this is a kick *** movie, amazing death on a stick action, great characters and a great way to send off a character so many of us have enjoyed for so very long. looks like the same thing as we had with rocky, a great ending to a franchise that was muddled by the last so-called"final installment"rocky 5 and rambo 3.cant wait to see this one tomorrow. (Reply to this) |
|
Rated_Xpert writes: on Jan 24 2008 10:43 AM People look to deep into action movies. I go to the movies with no expectations and usually come out happy. When I go see a movie like Rambo I want to see knives, machine guns shooting 10,000 rounds without reloading and big big explosions. If I het that I'm satified. I stopped looking for depth and intelegence in hollywood a long time ago. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |













