Click to read the article
Jurassic Park III (2001)
Runtime: 1 hr 33 mins
Synopsis: Paleontologist Alan Grant (Sam Neill) has sworn never to return to Jurassic Park. But he needs funding for his research, so when a wealthy thrill-seeking couple (William H. Macy and Téa Leoni) come calling, Grant and his protégée, Billy (Alessandro Nivola), agree to take them on a... Paleontologist Alan Grant (Sam Neill) has sworn never to return to Jurassic Park. But he needs funding for his research, so when a wealthy thrill-seeking couple (William H. Macy and Téa Leoni) come calling, Grant and his protégée, Billy (Alessandro Nivola), agree to take them on a sightseeing flight. By the time Grant finds out what their true purpose is--to land on the island and search for their missing son--all of their lives are in peril. And Grant's newfound theory about Raptor intelligence will have its deadly proof. Joe Johnston was the right director to take over Steven Spielberg's JURASSIC PARK series. He's experienced with special effects, having worked on the STAR WARS films, while his OCTOBER SKY demonstrates his skill at telling an emotionally involving tale. In JURASSIC PARK 3, with the help of a top-notch technical team and a talented cast (who began filming before the script was finished, improvising much of their dialogue), and a new dinosaur, Spinosaurus, that makes even T-Rex nervous, Johnston has fashioned a rousing adventure with state-of-the-art visuals. Clocking in at a tense 92 minutes, it's the fastest-moving, most action-packed film of the series. [More]
Genre: Action/Adventure
Starring: Sam Neill, William H. Macy, Téa Leoni, Laura Dern, John Diehl
Screenwriter: Peter Buchman, Alexander Payne, Jim Taylor
Producer: Larry J. Franco, Kathleen Kennedy
Composer: Don Davis
Reviews
It’s not brilliant, it’s rather predictable, but it’s ok; it bowls along nicely and it does make you jump. What more can you ask of dinosaurs?
It lacks the scale, the chills and the wonder of the original, but is more fun as a thrill ride than its sequel predecessor.
Compared to some of this summer's blockbusters ... this is better than average.
Much darker than the previous films, this third installment feels more like a horror flick set in amusement park than a good sci-fi adventure, though special effects, due to technology advances, are more sophisticated.
As seqüências de ação são boas, mas não o bastante para que ignoremos a fragilidade do roteiro, com seus péssimos diálogos e os personagens esquemáticos.
It might as well be the crappy pilot for a Jurassic Park TV series or a feature version of Sid and Marty Krofft's Land of the Lost.
It's not art ... it's entertainment, and it knows it. Boy, does it entertain.
If you're looking for a tight script, interesting three-dimensional characters and something new with this movie, you will be disappointed.
For a sequel with a Roman numeral in the title, Jurassic Park III is more entertaining than expected.
Milking a Brontosaurus would be easier than milking this franchise any more . . . This pointless sequel is a tepid end (if there is a God) to the series
People who go to see Jurassic Park III are not there for character development, they want cool-looking dinosaurs, and that they will get in spades.
Related Forums

by: REEL_REVIEWER 2/5/05
Pictures
News
posted by Jeff Giles February 05, 2008
Mere days after being left at the altar by (ex-) director Mark Romanek, Universal's The Wolf Man has found itself a new...
posted by Scott Weinberg April 13, 2007
There are at least three sequels that we know are definitely (albeit eventually) arriving. Well, a whole lot more than...
posted by Fred Topel April 07, 2007
Laura Dern confirmed that she has been approached for "Jurassic Park IV," the secretly developing sequel....
posted by Scott Weinberg March 09, 2007
He capably anchored the first and third "Jurassic Park" movies, but it looks like Sam Neill won't be invited...


Top Critic
