ROTTEN TOMATOES: Amy Adams Spending A Night at the Museum with Ben Stiller

Amy Adams Spending A Night at the Museum with Ben Stiller

The sequel America demanded is finally on its way.

by Jeff Giles | February 06, 2008

Critics have loved Amy Adams since her Junebug days, but now that she's charmed audiences on a larger scale with Enchanted, she's finding herself in demand for more high-profile projects.

Next on the list, according to Variety, is a role in Night at the Museum 2, the sequel to -- you guessed it -- 2006's Night at the Museum, the Ben Stiller comedy that went on to over $573 million in worldwide grosses.

We repeat: $573 million.

Anyway, yeah, 20th Century Fox is excited for the sequel's May start -- and who wouldn't be, with a synopsis like the one published by Variety?

Pic kicks off when the artifacts from the Museum of Natural History are boxed up and sent to the archives at the Smithsonian in Washington. Adams will play an undetermined historical figure who has a crush on security guard Larry (Stiller).

As with the first Museum, Shawn Levy will direct from a script by Robert Ben Garant and Thomas Lennon -- with help from Scott Frank, who, according to Variety, wrote "the most recent draft."

Before making goo-goo eyes at Stiller, Adams will be seen in Sunshine Cleaning, which features no Dick Van Dyke or animated dinosaur skeletons, but earned positive reviews at Sundance anyway.

Source: Variety

Related Items

Movie:	Sunshine Cleaning
	Enchanted
	Night at the Museum
	Junebug
Celeb:	Robert Ben Garant
	Amy Adams
	Thomas Lennon
	Scott Frank
	Shawn Levy
	Dick Van Dyke
	Ben Stiller

(1-11 of 11 posts) | Reply

Warheart1188 writes:
on Feb 06 2008 05:33 AM

awesome. Amy Adams was so adorable in Enchanted and she's very, very hot, I might add.

(Reply to this)

Gimy writes:
on Feb 06 2008 06:10 AM

i thought the chic who played Sacajeweah...however you spell it...was hot in the first one. she reminded me of a tan Brittany Daniel. i liked the first one, i thought it was really cute so this better be decent. sometimes Stiller can get repetitive so hopefully its not an EXACT rehash of the first film...

(Reply to this)

lonechicken writes:
on Feb 06 2008 07:01 AM

Love the Amy Adams, but what happened to Carla Gugino?

(Reply to this)

jasperoosterveld writes:
on Feb 06 2008 07:02 AM

haha i love the part "i repeat $573 million" lol.

The first one was ok but nothing special, only the monkey was funny. But with that gross not a suprise they are making a sequal.

(Reply to this)

TombstoneLawDog writes:
on Feb 06 2008 08:06 AM

I really don't think you need to read beyond the part where it says

'Adams will play an undetermined historical figure who has a crush on security guard Larry (Stiller)'

...in other words, my *favorite* way to make a movie- get commodities first and then worry about plot, details, story and purpose later. "Who needs to sweat the small stuff? We just bagged a hot property! How can we POSSIBLY miss?!

It's not that I don't understand why they do this, but it does make me want to punch something.

(Reply to this)

jokerboy1991 writes:
on Feb 06 2008 09:02 AM

I would love to spen the night with Amy Adams. thats cool though, the 1st one was kinda funny this one could be better.

(Reply to this)

jokerboy1991_ writes:
on Feb 06 2008 09:04 AM

this movie sucks

(Reply to this)

jokerboy1991 writes:
on Feb 06 2008 09:05 AM

I didnt write that it sucks some A-Hole got my password.

(Reply to this)

unbreakable_samurai writes:
on Feb 06 2008 10:58 AM

The first one was alright, I'm not really excited for another. I love Adams though, I wish she would do something else instead. But this is written by Frank, so it will probably be an improvement.

(Reply to this)

a_sad_un-sorry_hashbrown writes:
on Feb 06 2008 02:50 PM

Amy Adams is wasting her time on this braindead sequel to a movie that wasted some creative potential.

(Reply to this)

mrdarklight writes:
on Feb 06 2008 06:06 PM

In reply to this comment (#1557040)
I agree completely. It's an awful way to make a film. It smacks of formula-ism, mostly. It reminds me of that scene in Barton Fink: "He's a wrestler, naturally he'll have to get involved with a love interest... a dame or an orphan. What do you think Bart?"

(Reply to this)