Ten years ago this month, excitement reached fever pitch ahead of the release of Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace. After 16 years without a Star Wars film in cinemas, an entire generation got ready to experience the magic of George Lucas' space opera on the big screen.
We all remember our reaction when the film finally unspooled. Though the film set box office records and managed to stay fresh in the eyes of critics, fan reaction was generally pretty cool. Plenty of criticism was leveled at the film's new foibles, not least Ahmed Best's Jar-Jar Binks, who managed to offend even the staunchest of Ewok apologists. Indeed, we seem to gloss over the popularity of the character with the under-10s who spent as much allowance as they could muster on various pieces of merchandise emblazoned with the Gungan's stupid face.
But while most of us remember how we felt after we saw the movie, how familiar are we with the levels of excitement we felt before? Journalist and Star Wars fan Scott Andrews presents a timeline of anticipation for Episode I.
1994
- November 1st - George Lucas begins writing the first prequel.
It's based on an outline written in 1976, before Episode IV was released.
1997
- June 26th - Filming begins.
The shoot moves between Leavesden Studios in the UK, Tozeur, Nefta and the not-coincidentally-named Tataouine in Tunisia and Caserta in Italy.
- September 30th - Filming ends.

Familiar architecture? Tataouine in Tunisia.
1998
- August 13th - US release date announced as May 21st 1999.
- September 21st - International release schedule announced.
People in the US with camcorders realise that they're going to have two months to secretly film it and distribute it online so people in the UK can see it.
- November 17th - Trailer released in US cinemas.
According to the New York Times, a cinema showing Denzel Washington thriller The Siege took about $1000 on the 16th. When the film was shown the next day, with Star Wars trailer attached, it took $13,000. Meet Joe Black and Wing Commander also benefit, as cinemagoers turn up, buy tickets, watch the minute-long trailer... and then leave. Paul Dergarabedian, president of Exhibitor Relations, tells the paper, "This is incredible. We've never heard of a trailer packing people into a theater. It's a precedent-setting event."
To try and get people to stay put, some cinemas announce that they'll be screening it twice - both before and after the main feature. And it's worth it, because the trailer is brilliant, giving us Yoda, Samuel L. Jackson, a slightly bored looking Liam Neeson, and lots of great production design. We get our first proper glimpse of Jar-Jar Binks, but he's not really in it that much, so we're lulled into a false sense of security.
- November 23rd - The trailer hits the web.
Lucasfilm's servers go into meltdown as they receive up to 400 hits a second. Marc Hedlund, director of Internet development for Lucasfilm, tells the Times: "We knew it was going to be popular, but I'm still surprised at the reaction." Maybe this new fangled interweb thing is going to catch on, eh, Marc?
- December 16th - The trailer hits UK cinemas.
The trailer is given its own premiere at Leicester Square Odeon two days before it goes on general release for six weeks. It's pulled after that on the order of George Lucas. The poster of young Anakin with Darth Vader's shadow begins to appear everywhere. Rumours that it was actually self-replicating, like some sort of paper-based virus, remain unconfirmed.
The first teaser trailer.
|
Tyler J. writes: on May 29 2009 09:16 AM It's not THAT bad (Reply to this) |
|
CFM writes: on May 29 2009 09:17 AM Now, there are things I don't like about the prequel Episodes (and Return of the Jedi for that matter): Jar-Jar Binks, Jake Lloyd, some script and acting issues, and the overall aspiration to be a kid movie. I didn't like any of them anywhere near as much as New Hope and Empire Strikes Back. But even with these issues, they were all still alot of fun, there is still ALOT to love in each movie. I still watch them all every couple years of so. May the Force be with you, young padawan. (Reply to this) |
|
Vincent Rolandelli writes: on May 29 2009 09:22 AM The best of the newer films. Although if Darth maul would have been kept alive it would have done wonders for the follow ups. (Reply to this) |
|
Lauren J. writes: on May 29 2009 09:27 AM I remember this well. I was in junior high and it was my first midnight showing. My excitement was beyond anything. When I think back there wasn't much that could live up to the hype of an obsessive young teen and her nerdy friends. The feeling when the movie started and when it ended was night and day. Disappointment can't even describe it. I felt embarrassed for having been so excited. (Reply to this) |
|
mightysourdough writes: on May 29 2009 09:36 AM I can remember waiting for what seemed like forever for this movie to come out. I went and saw it opening night of corse. In the jam packed cinema the movie played to chorus of cheers. I left thinking this was great just what I've been waiting for. So the next day I go again and I take my non-Star Wars fan friend thinking this will show him what all the hub bub is about. All I can remember is Jar-Jar's face and his imortal "Exsqussse ME" line, the terrible acting, the cartoonish CGI, Jake Lloyd saying "Lets try spinning, thats a neat trick", Qui-Gon using a ladies bic razor as his com-link, AND FING JAR-JAR BINKS "EXSQUSSSE ME" line. (Reply to this) |
|
Zen Bullet writes: on May 29 2009 09:53 AM I took my dad to see it and I remember, five minutes into it, confessing to him that it felt like a Power Rangers episode. By the time the film arrived at the duel with Maul on Tattooine I was itching to leave, but my misplaced faith in Lucas kept me seated for the whole interminable experience. When my dad and I finally left the theater he said that it was the most amateurish filmmaking effort he'd ever seen at the studio budget level. (Reply to this) |
|
rle4lunch writes: on May 29 2009 09:56 AM ugh. There's so much I want to enjoy about this movie, but it's just so damned bad in some spots it just ruins it for me. Even the pod racer thing is overrated IMO. Although the time line thing was good on this article. It made me remember what Ewan was saying about the film and how truly bad Jake Lloyd's acting was. horrendous! (Reply to this) |
|
Funkmaster Flex writes: on May 29 2009 10:01 AM I remember going to see it in the middle of the day in a small town near where I lived on the first day. The theater was about 2/3 full. I remember being annoyed by Jar-Jar. I remember thinking that the acting was on par with Mark Hamils in A New Hope. I also remember being blwon away by the pod race and the space and light saber battles at the end. I immediately went home and watched IV again. Ep. I was at the same time the worst Star Wars movies I had seen, and the best overall movie I had seen that year. Lucas is at his best when he has to make the most out of a little. He had way too much time and money for Ep. 1. (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg writes: on May 29 2009 10:05 AM I have a mixed reaction to this, but I guess I can watch because it's Star Wars. 6/10. Jake Lloyd and those Asian sounding aliens are the worst. Great lightsaber duel, and Liam Neeson is good. Yoda looks his ugliest. Muppet Yoda is the best, but this Yoda wasn't CGI or a Muppet. But people, this dosen't make George Lucas a bad filmaker. He's one of the best. He gave us Indiana Jones and Star Wars, and just beause his newer stuff hasn't been so hot, people say he's bad. THAT'S INSANE! Here's my score of his recent work. Attack of the Clones - 6/10 Revenge of the Sith -8/10 Kingdom of the Crystal Skull - 9/10 The Clone Wars - I can't watch it. It looks so horrible. (Reply to this) |
|
willywonkanobi writes: on May 29 2009 10:13 AM it is my least favorite of all the Star Wars films followed closely by episode 2. (Reply to this) |
|
Jane Doe writes: on May 29 2009 10:14 AM there has never been a Skywalker that can act. The best I can think of is the gnarled old sloth-esque Vader at the end of Jedi. The rest were garbage. (Reply to this) |
|
Holly Jolly writes: on May 29 2009 10:14 AM What I love most about Episode 1 is how many idiots like to whine and bash the film...and yet they went and saw it more than once in theaters. I personally really enjoyed it and feel it still is better than most epic action movies to come out in the past 10 years. In my opinion Episode One was better than Spider-man, Spider-man 3, X-men, X-men 3, Superman Returns, The Mummy, Van Helsing, Matrix Reloaded, The Day the Earth Stood Still, Serenity, King Kong, Return of the King, Troy... I know many will disagree but that's how it works. George Lucas can't direct actors to save his life. Peter Jackson on the other hand can manage to lose lots of body weight, yet he can't seem to cut down his films. It's pathetic. (Reply to this) |
|
Sweep_the_Leg writes: on May 29 2009 10:17 AM In reply to this comment (#2522703) How do you give that abortion of the Indiana Jones triology Kingdom of the Crystal Skull a 9/10 are you high? At least you are right about the Clone Wars movie I can't watch it either it does look really bad. I enjoyed the Phantom Edit more than Lucas' version it made the movie more in the flow of Star Wars. (Reply to this) |
|
zaphod67 writes: on May 29 2009 10:24 AM I was 9 when Star Wars was released & had my life ruined by the experience. By the time Return of the Jedi was released, I was 15 & saw it opening day with an extreme amount of excitement & anticipation, followed by a disappointment which was about as crushing as when I saw Star Trek-The Motion Picture. (I have always been a fan of both franchises) I was looking forward to Phantom Menace & even camped out to get tickets for the 1st day showing. My immediate frustration was the fact that I had problems understanding Jar Jar Binks most of the time. My immediate response when the end credits rolled was that it wasn't as good as Star Wars or Empire Strikes Back, but better than Jedi. I still feel that way. (Reply to this) |
|
tgibfo writes: on May 29 2009 10:29 AM I cannot BELIEVE anyone gave PHANTOM MENACE more than 33%. It's an insult. Aside from incredible visuals, it's a bad story, script nightmare, character-less, and offensive to as many races as George seems to be able to fit into two hours. Add that to the fact that he took the neuvo-Darth Vader (Maul) and WASTED him. This was even worse than KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL and for me, that's saying something. People need to start looking past the "kid" goggles and watch the movies for what they are: bad. (Reply to this) |
|
DarthRage writes: on May 29 2009 10:33 AM Lucas should have let someone else direct it. He is just too......banal? (Reply to this) |
|
Alex L. writes: on May 29 2009 10:35 AM I grew up on the original three movies, and loved them quite a bit. Watching Episode 1 made me realize that George Lucas likes his special effects company quite a bit, but he lacks the ability to direct, edit, and write a good story more than once. The acting was bland, the tedious racing scene *blah*, and just bad/boring/stupid characters ruined the whole thing. At least it had a cool fight scene at the end; too bad the villain was anything but interesting... we see him for a few scenes and then he gets cut in half *heh*. I wanted to like the movie, but I just couldn't. Lucas reminds me of one of those "one hit wonders" from the 80's who tries their best to create the success of their first album, only to flop and realize that they got "lucky" with their first hit. In the end, they don't really have any talent. BTW, the horrendous re-editing of the original three movies with special effects that don't fit the movies and changing of music is the stupidest idea ever. I guess that's just how Lucas rolls. (Reply to this) |
|
ledawg writes: on May 29 2009 10:36 AM In reply to this comment (#2522717) Look, I've said 1,417,945,602 times, "Indy 4" kept in the spirit of the originals. My only issue is that Marion and Indy don't quite sizzle anymore, and the visuals look caroonish. It's still a worthy entry in the Indiana Jones series. And I'm sober at the moment! (Reply to this) |
|
King Thor writes: on May 29 2009 10:43 AM The bad parts of this movie were just so damn bad. A big problem for me is the pod racing. Why in the world did it involve pod racing to that extreme extent? Horrible. It was almost completely pointless and so time consuming. Jar Jar Binks is probably the worst and most annoying character ever created in a movie. Darth Maul and Liam Neeson's Qui Gon Jin should've been kept alive, as i thought they were the two best parts of the entire movie and would've helped out Attack of the Clones. I've always wanted to see episodes 7, 8, and 9, but after seeing Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones (thought Revenge of the Sith was great), not if George Lucas directs them (which he obviously will never be doing). (Reply to this) |
|
ARTaylor writes: on May 29 2009 10:49 AM I remember being so excited about this movie. I stayed up till midnight to get all the action figures. I got the soundtrack, first soundtrack of many that I still own. I bought a t-shirt just for the premiere. I saw it twice in the first day after taking the day off from school. And it was the first DVD I ever owned. Looking back on it now the only parts I actually enjoy is Qui-Gon, Darth Maul, and the pod racing. All of which they got rid of in the following movies. The acting is so blah and uninteresting. I understand what Lucas was trying with Jar Jar but he overused him far too much. The story is overly grand for an event that really makes no difference whatsoever. It's trying to be bigger and better than the final battle in Return of the Jedi when nothing in the series should even attempt to top it. And it's just creepy to see a ten year-old and someone almost twice his age flirt with one another. Though I think Attack of the Clones is a lot worse than this one. (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |














