RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
News
RT Sees the First 30 Minutes of Wall-E!
We visit Pixar, and chat with director Andrew Stanton too.
by Steven Horn | April 08, 2008
Discuss Article
Page | 1 2
RT was among a group of journalists invited to the factory that Luxo built: Pixar Animation Studios. We were given the whirlwind tour as the company winds up for its big summer release Wall-E, set to pop on June 27, 2008, and also got to see the first 30 minutes of the film. Finally, we ended with an intimate Q+A session with the film's writer/director Andrew Stanton.

"Small on the massive backdrop..."
Andrew Stanton said that during our interview in reference to a story element in Wall-E but he could has just as easily been describing Pixar's clean, green, and charmed campus-like headquarters off a quiet backstreet in Emeryville, CA. Small is the building itself, in terms of production houses at least. Its physical footprint is tiny. The massive backdrop is of course Hollywood and the billions that have been transacted around the stories and art coming from said building, a whole world of profit and cheer and excellence emanating outward, movie magic in every sense.

Check out this "all Certified Fresh" Pixar roll-call and Tomatometer scores:
  • Ratatouille - 95%
  • Cars - 75%
  • The Incredibles - 97%
  • Finding Nemo - 98%
  • Monsters, Inc. - 95%
  • Toy Story 2 - 100%
  • A Bug's Life - 91%
  • Toy Story - 100%


Our tour began in the enormous and airy central lobby which connects two sides of the building and houses everything from a cereal room to employee mailboxes, bathrooms to comfy chairs to lounge on, and of course a delicious-smelling café. The idea is not unlike a quad on a university or a student center, a place where despite their ultimate destination, all must pass through and interact with one another. In this instance, the place was still packed with Ratatouille paraphernalia hanging from the posts and walls while tucked in the corner were past standees of other Pixar films. In fact, all through the halls of Pixar, one finds concept art, exhibits, and some amazingly realized figurines and maquettes.

Shall we play a game?
We then rolled up to a massive server room that reminded me of something out of Wargames. I expected to see WOPR standing there in a corner humming away. Racks and racks of servers relentlessly chewing away on data. Our tour guide told us that despite the advances in processing power, it still takes an incredible amount of time to render one second of film.

Deeper in the building we found the art department and animators. No cubicle farm here, the brass at Pixar decided to let individuality be the reigning factor in office design. From a tiki lounge to a storage shed complete with window-boxed flowers to one of apparently several functioning bars, the animators looked to be a happy bunch whose creativity spilled over into all that they did.

Finding Wall-E
After our tour, we were led into a plush screening room where Stanton briefly set up Wall-E for us, noting that we were among the first to see the first 30 minutes of the film. The lights went low, a comet flashed overhead in a star sky ceiling, and that familiar Pixar logo crawled across the screen.

The planet is awash in garbage. It is piled high, in fantastic towers, while dust-choked skies and unchecked winds ravage. Tales of a quick exit and desertion are everywhere: scattered newspapers and display monitors imploring people to leave, storefronts left open, and running through it all is a single robot tagged Wall-E (Waste Allocation Load Lifter Earth-Class). Wall-E is, like all machines, doing exactly what he is supposed to be doing and what he was programmed for: cleaning up. Throughout the course of the first few minutes though, we learn that he has also developed a personality.

He is self-repairing (stopping along the way to retread his "feet" from another, broken down Wall-E unit) and works to compact and pile the garbage. He collects trinkets as he is cleaning up garbage, shiny things, toys, which he stores in the maintenance shed in which he lives with a cockroach. In seems, despite being the last of his kind, that Wall-E has survived how most of us do: just getting through the day until he comes home to his sanctuary. It is here where we really get to meet Wall-E. While watching Hello Dolly, he gently clasps his hands together and stares at the screen, obviously alone.

The design of Wall-E is nothing short of spectacular. The movie instantly looks and feels exactly like what it is supposed to. Wall-E himself, has cute giant eyes, a short stumpy body, and whirrs and clicks that sound child-like and kind. He oozes personality and charm. It's almost too cliché to repeat it but we're doing it anyway: we forgot that we were watching animation.

A Robot's Life
Day in and day out Wall-E toils until a massive ship plops down and drops off EVE, a sleeker newer, fiercer unit who not only tries to blow Wall-E away but begins scanning the planet with an almost crazed sense of desperation. A monster dust storm rolls through and EVE and Wall-E take cover, getting to know each other through cautious interaction, like every first date ever. When EVE finally finds what she is looking for, she buttons into a pod-like device and awaits the return of the mothership. As the ship blasts off into space, Wall-E decides to jump aboard and off into space he goes, toward his rendez-vous with the former inhabitants of Earth.

I love every bit of this so far. The film hits on some of the best parts of sci-fi and has such rich characterization and subtlety throughout that you feel very well taken care of as an audience member. Watching this first chop of film, with little human dialogue (other than incidental) for the first 30 minutes, you feel like someone was paying attention to films like 2001: A Space Odyssey, Castaway, the Qatsi trilogy, The Bear, Faces and more. The effect is something I never thought I would see in a film from Pixar and speaks to the film's bold ambition and dedication to a conceit.

After the film screened, we were joined by a thoughtful and clearly proud Andrew Stanton for an extended interview:

Was the intention to make Eve look like an Apple product?

Andrew Stanton: We were certainly influenced by the design. The biggest thing was, what's the sexiest other end of the spectrum. We kept saying Wall-E is a tractor and she's a Mercedes. So [in] the world of technology, what's the sleekest, most seamless, where the moving parts are hidden. So we sort of riffed off of anything of that ilk. Although after we had her designed, we had Johnny Iams, who does all of the design at Apple, we invited him over and he was very seduced by it. Who knows if a weird chicken and egg thing will happen (laughs) based on that. He approved highly.

What kind of reaction were you getting because in the first 30 minutes there was no dialogue in the film?

Andrew Stanton: First of all, I think that that's a misnomer. There is dialog all through it. All I am saying is that they are not necessarily saying words in a language that you know. What I wanted was integrity. It all comes down to just as much as I believe that Luxo is a lamp and that it has a life in it and it thinks like a lamp and acts like a lamp and I don't have to be told that, it doesn't have to be spelled out to me, I just get it right away, I wanted the same thing with the robots. I wanted you to believe that that's a machine and it's been there for hundreds of years, it's been weathered, and it has a thought process on its own. It was designed a certain way so therefore it would have a certain way that it spoke electronically and Eve was designed a certain way and would speak a certain way electronically. I just wanted things to be sort of, logic-based, and it was all to service the integrity of the world, because I just want to believe that I am there. I want to believe it's really happening. So that shows the look of the film, the lens choice, some of the technological advances we made so that you'll get more of a sense of the three dimensional atmosphere. Anything we did was just to enhance the experience of believability.

Read on to page two for more from Andrew Stanton...
Next Page >>
Bookmark and Share
Page | 1 2
Comments (1-20 of 65 posts) | Reply
N720MF
N720MF writes:
on Apr 08 2008 12:51 AM

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. This movie is going to be awesome, once again (I forget the slight misstep that was Cars).

(Reply to this)
Floor Man
Floor Man writes:
on Apr 08 2008 01:22 AM

In reply to this comment (#1676078)
Seconded! This looks to be one of Pixar's most different and most artful (as if Pixar weren't already ;) ) films! :) I love Stanton...Pixar...and especially Ben Burrt. The man's a genius.

JUUUUUUUNE! Too far away. :(


(Reply to this)
Viginti-Tres
Viginti-Tres writes:
on Apr 08 2008 03:50 AM


Another academy award in the bag for Pixar!


(Reply to this)
Paralyzer
Paralyzer writes:
on Apr 08 2008 05:17 AM

true i smell another oscar

(Reply to this)
jrrrz
jrrrz writes:
on Apr 08 2008 05:36 AM

can anybody say....SHORT CIRCUIT ripoff ??? the story might be different but the robot sure looks almost the same. interesting.


(Reply to this)
Brian82
Brian82 writes:
on Apr 08 2008 06:58 AM

This could be the best film of the year. Pixar seem to know what the audience wants to see in 3 films from now and they put that into the next film. Always a few steps ahead they are!

(Reply to this)
minderbinder
minderbinder writes:
on Apr 08 2008 07:34 AM

"can anybody say....SHORT CIRCUIT ripoff ???"

No.

I have to agree that this looks like it has the potential to be pixar's best and one of the best movies of the year. It's certainly one of my most anticipated.

I have to give them credit for making some bold moves with this one, the lack of dialogue and the use of live action footage. Looks awesome.


(Reply to this)
Shadow16nh
Shadow16nh writes:
on Apr 08 2008 07:42 AM

This movie is clearly a ripoff of itself.

(Reply to this)
u1sart
u1sart writes:
on Apr 08 2008 08:14 AM

Amazing... i definatly have to see this for sure along with ma daughter of course


(Reply to this)
TheMcKellar
TheMcKellar writes:
on Apr 08 2008 08:18 AM

I can't wait till Toy Story 3. Can you guys imagine how big of a deal that it will be?

(Reply to this)
Slipperypick
Slipperypick writes:
on Apr 08 2008 08:28 AM

As always, Pixar's gonna rule my summer viewing. But I have to ask... Why is Cars considered their "misstep?" Visually speaking it is flawless, the voice talent is perfectly matched and the dialog is fresh and hilarious. Is it because of the story? The fact that the characters are cars?
Keep in mind that Pixar's stories are ALL very basic and have been told before; the Pixar POV is what makes them "pop" like new (the closest thing to an exception here is the sheer genius of Monsters, Inc.). And so what if cars are characters? Why is that so different from toys being alive? Or fish having human qualities and values in a human world? Or a robot being able to think and feel?
I just don't get why Cars is the Pixar whipping boy. It's a great movie, one of my favorites.


(Reply to this)
Slipperypick
Slipperypick writes:
on Apr 08 2008 08:29 AM

Oh, and about the short circuit ripoff...

Um, no.


(Reply to this)
ovi d
ovi d writes:
on Apr 08 2008 09:08 AM

Slippery dude, i completely agree with you man.... Cars was definitely their most accomplished product visually, and the storytelling was just as good as any other disney/pixar adventure.. dunno y ppl hav to treat it like a mole on an otherwise unblemished face then..

(Reply to this)
trgdr777
trgdr777 writes:
on Apr 08 2008 09:14 AM

When I saw the latest trailer I got so excited for this. No doubt it will be amazing.

Slipperypick: I think it was a combination of people expecting something different from what the movie actually was (it wasn't as fast paced as some might have thought) and the fact that it came after The Incredibles. The Incredibles had a more mature tone and a lot of action, and I guess some people were hoping for more of that. I don't dislike Cars, but I must say it isn't my favorite. I enjoyed it, but I prefer a different kind of movie. I agree though that it does get treated like the whipping boy even though it's 10x better than the crap some studios put out.

Sorry for rambling... Yay for WALL-E!


(Reply to this)
JUDGE DREDD
JUDGE DREDD writes:
on Apr 08 2008 09:19 AM

Err, as for the short rip-off comment. It is obviously very similar, to just say NO is silly denial and the beginnings of fandom. A rip off NO! But obviously heavily inspired. Thats not a bad thing though.

Now look at the shape and storyline of short-circuit. You could say its a direct rip off of E.T. same shape, just a metal version. Similar storyline too.

This looks amazing, thats all i know. And looks to be the like the pixar that im most interested in seeing. I like robot stuff, and rusty scenery.

As for Cars, i liked that too. Why do some of you think it a mistep? Thought it was a great movie, took a while to get into, but soon as they hit the sleepy ol town it became a movie, not just racing. great film.

Only thing that bothers me about some pixar, particularly Ratatouille and Nemo, is as stunning as they are, they seem to lack on humour.

Toy story has humour, and my fave so far, Incredibles is just perfect.
Nemo, was a bit sappy in places, despite its visuals. And if anyone else does a seagull inpression to me in defence of its lack of humour comment. I'm gonna go all Dexter on em!!!




(Reply to this)
DarthWonka
DarthWonka writes:
on Apr 08 2008 09:26 AM

I didn't see Cars, but I still don't get why Pixar didn't tell a story about a world of cars in a world of humans. What planet does Cars take place in that everyone is a car? Toy Story gave us toys in a human world, Monsters Inc. - monsters among humans, Bug's Life - bugs in a human world, Finding Nemo, and so on.

As well, yes, bat fink, don't know why no one pointed it out before but Walle looks like ET more than anyone else. I don't have any problem with that, but when I first saw the trailer it was the very first connection to come to mind.


(Reply to this)
mightyfooda
mightyfooda writes:
on Apr 08 2008 10:23 AM

In reply to this comment (#1676152)
Short Circuit is crap, I wouldn't think people who've come up with the amazing ideas that Pixar has come up with would need to coppy that garbage. Short Circuit itself wasn't exactly an original design. Robots from the early eighties that looked like that were a dime a dozen.

(Reply to this)
Volcomfever
Volcomfever writes:
on Apr 08 2008 10:23 AM

DarthWonka, I agree with you. Where exactly is this "Cars" world? I love all the pixar movies, including cars, but I think the general concensus on cars is that is the worst out of all their movies. Does that mean it's horrible or bad or anything of the sorts? No. But out of all the pixar movies, I think it is the inferior one.

Why though? For me personally, it just didn't...I don't know, pop like the other pixar movies do. When I saw the toy stories, and bugs life, and monsters inc and especially the incredibles, they all had this magic that was like...wow, this is awesome. Maybe it was the lack of humans in cars that did it but for me, it just didn't feel the same. Visually though, it was/is stunning. The voice acting was also well done. Overall, I still like it, just like it the least out of all the pixar movies.

As for WALL-E, this movie is gonna be great. It really does look like another knockout for pixar. And why is it like short circuit cause a robot is also the lead character? Every movie borrows from every movie. It's just the way it goes.


(Reply to this)
RawIsRamsey
RawIsRamsey writes:
on Apr 08 2008 10:44 AM

If Cars is a mole on Pixar's unblemished face, it's the Cindy Crawford mole. Nothing wrong with the movie, and it's their most successful product line ever...Cars stuff is still getting cranked out weekly and there is supposedly a sequel on the way.

As amazing as Wall-E looks, I need dialogue. Just makes a movie a movie. I'll still see it, I'll still enjoy it, but they're turning off a huge part of their audience (the kids) by having their main character not talk. Kids aren't deep enough to get imagery and symbolism as figures of speech. Pixar's main customers are, of course, the kids, and the kids won't see this. It just seems they're making this movie to wave their digital dick around saying "hey, look how AWESOME CGI is now!" and playing strictly to artsy adults. Just look at the box office of Ratatouille to see how well being "artsy" pays off for Pixar. Art does not equal dollars. Now, it wasn't a flop, but look at their more kid-friendly pics like Toy Story and Finding Nemo...huge.

I'm not taking away anything from Pixar. Their animation and storytelling are stellar, but the stuff just isn't for kids anymore...The movie will be great, but it's going to tank. You heard it here first.


(Reply to this)
ffamilyguy
ffamilyguy writes:
on Apr 08 2008 11:01 AM

In reply to this comment (#1676243)
Wall E looks more like a robot E.T., "Short Circuit" ripped off the body design of "E.T."

I mean, everyone was trying to make a family hit like "E.T." after it came out, including "Short Circuit"!


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2 3 4
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

WALL-E
  • Pictures
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • The Legacy of The Matrix (55)
  • Backstage at the Oscars: My First Time (10)
  • Juno, TDK, WALL-E Win Grammys Opens in new window (0)
  • Broadcast Film Critics Name Critics' Choice Winners (1)
  • Dark Knight Sweeps People's Choice Awards Opens in new window (8)
  • AFI Names 2008's Finest Films Opens in new window (3)
  • Milk Takes NY Film Critics' Top Honors Opens in new window (5)
  • L.A. Film Critics Name WALL-E Best of '08 Opens in new window (25)
  • Time Names Its Favorite Films of '08 Opens in new window (44)
  • National Board of Review Names Slumdog Millionaire Best of '08 Opens in new window (3)

Most Discussed

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Transformers 2 Generates Explosive Box Office (168)
  • Critics Consensus: Solid Public Enemies Doesn't Quite Bring The Noise (104)
  • Five Favorite Films with Fred Durst (86)
  • RoboGeisha: 2009's Most Insane Trailer? (73)
  • Total Recall: Johnny Depp's Best Movies (70)
  • RT on DVD: Street Fighter, Transmorphers 2, and Uwe Boll's Tunnel Rats! (36)
  • Academy Invites Tyler Perry, Michael Cera, Seth Rogen to Join Oscar Ranks (28)
  • Karl Malden: 1912-2009 (17)
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Dinosaurs and Gangsters Spark Fireworks (17)
  • Edinburgh 2009: RT's 10 Must-See Movies (9)

Latest News

  • Blood: The Last Vampire -- Exclusive Concept Art and Artist Profile (8)
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Dinosaurs and Gangsters Spark Fireworks (17)
  • The Friday Harvest: Ice Age 3, Gamer, Daybreakers, and more! (1)
  • Total Recall: Johnny Depp's Best Movies (70)
  • RoboGeisha: 2009's Most Insane Trailer? (73)
  • Karl Malden: 1912-2009 (17)
  • Celebrate the Fourth of July with 50 Movies For 50 States! (0)
  • Critics Consensus: Solid Public Enemies Doesn't Quite Bring The Noise (104)
  • Academy Invites Tyler Perry, Michael Cera, Seth Rogen to Join Oscar Ranks (28)
  • RT on DVD: Street Fighter, Transmorphers 2, and Uwe Boll's Tunnel Rats! (36)

Latest Interviews

  • RT Interview: Director Carlos Cuaron on Rudo and Cursi (0)
  • RT Interview: Tony Scott on The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 (10)
  • Cannes 2009: RT Interview - Sally Hawkins on We Want Sex (2)
  • RT Interview: Tilda Swinton on Julia (5)
  • Hollywood Legend Debbie Reynolds Reflects On her Life in Showbiz (10)
  • Exclusive: McG Talks Terminator Salvation (24)
  • Georgia Groome - Fresh Talent on RT (5)
  • RT Interview: Reading The Reader with Stephen Daldry (11)
  • RT Interview: Oscar Nominee Melissa Leo (7)
  • Carey Mulligan - Fresh Talent on RT (7)

Latest Features

  • Blood: The Last Vampire -- Exclusive Concept Art and Artist Profile (8)
  • Five Favorite Films with Fred Durst (86)
  • Edinburgh 2009: RT's 10 Must-See Movies (9)
  • Five Favourite Films with Diego Luna (8)
  • Five Favourite Films with Gael Garcia Bernal (8)
  • Who's Who in Transformers 2? A Visual Guide (160)
  • Five Favorite Films with Antonio Banderas (39)
  • Five Favorite Films with Betty White (31)
  • Five Favourite Films with Wes Craven (26)
  • A Hundred Years of Heist Films (45)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive | Green Pixels


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2009, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.