Critical Consensus: Lions And Witches And Wardrobes, Oh My!
This week's sole wide release is the highly anticipated "The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe." Will the film garner the lion's share of accolades?
Once "The Lord of the Rings" became a hot cinematic property, it was inevitable that Hollywood would turn to Tolkien's friend and fellow fantasist C.S. Lewis and give his "The Chronicles of Narnia" for epic big screen treatment. It's got a built-in fan base, fantastical lands and creatures, and a grand quest. Critics say that although this is no "Lord of the Rings" (what is?), Andrew Adamson's film is largely a winner, filled with wondrous, phantasmagoric images, and deft acting. Though there are some complaints about the film's length (140 minutes) and some quibbles about the CGI effects, the scribes say fans will be pleased with "Narnia"'s adherence to, and in some cases improvement upon, the source material. At 78 percent on the Tomatometer, it's looking like the season of the "Witch." The "Narnia" series is off to a good start, as the first film is Certified Fresh.
In a completely unrelated note, I want to congratulate both almeisan and Galaxyfilms22 for their correct "Aeon Flux" Tomatometer predictions of 10 percent. As promised, you do indeed win props from Critical Consensus. However, a word of warning: Don't let the studios know about your Tomatometer crystal balls, because they might go to sinister lengths to get their hands on them. Additional props to rockstarfrank (who I assume is male) for his astute, insightful assessment of "Flux": 'This will clearly be one of the greatest movies in the history of mankind. I mean the grass attacks, people. The grass attacks!' Well put, Frank. The grass attacks, indeed.
Recent Children's Book Adaptations:
--------------------------------------------
88% -- Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005)
75% -- Zathura (2005)
83% -- Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005)
57% -- The Polar Express (2004)
71% -- Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events (2004)
Once "The Lord of the Rings" became a hot cinematic property, it was inevitable that Hollywood would turn to Tolkien's friend and fellow fantasist C.S. Lewis and give his "The Chronicles of Narnia" for epic big screen treatment. It's got a built-in fan base, fantastical lands and creatures, and a grand quest. Critics say that although this is no "Lord of the Rings" (what is?), Andrew Adamson's film is largely a winner, filled with wondrous, phantasmagoric images, and deft acting. Though there are some complaints about the film's length (140 minutes) and some quibbles about the CGI effects, the scribes say fans will be pleased with "Narnia"'s adherence to, and in some cases improvement upon, the source material. At 78 percent on the Tomatometer, it's looking like the season of the "Witch." The "Narnia" series is off to a good start, as the first film is Certified Fresh.
In a completely unrelated note, I want to congratulate both almeisan and Galaxyfilms22 for their correct "Aeon Flux" Tomatometer predictions of 10 percent. As promised, you do indeed win props from Critical Consensus. However, a word of warning: Don't let the studios know about your Tomatometer crystal balls, because they might go to sinister lengths to get their hands on them. Additional props to rockstarfrank (who I assume is male) for his astute, insightful assessment of "Flux": 'This will clearly be one of the greatest movies in the history of mankind. I mean the grass attacks, people. The grass attacks!' Well put, Frank. The grass attacks, indeed.
Recent Children's Book Adaptations:
--------------------------------------------
88% -- Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005)
75% -- Zathura (2005)
83% -- Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (2005)
57% -- The Polar Express (2004)
71% -- Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate Events (2004)
Related Items
|
rockstarfrank writes: on Dec 08 2005 08:09 PM Great article Tim Ryan. I am forwarding it to all my family and friends and thank you for the props. This may very well be the greatest day of my life. However, my wife claims this honor only further prooves her point that I have achieved nerd-dom. Well, obviously she is just insanely jeolous that she wasn't mentioned in the article. (Reply to this) |
|
rockstarfrank writes: on Dec 08 2005 08:26 PM By the way, anyone care to guess what percentage Narnia will end up with? I am hoping for 85%, but I realize that is a bit optimistic. (Reply to this) |
|
Skitch writes: on Dec 09 2005 06:17 AM I think thats a fair bet. Its the first number that popped into my head... (Reply to this) |
|
jbernand77 writes: on Dec 10 2005 07:04 AM [b]Not as expected[/b] Disney has disappointed many with this movie. The starting scenes have been dragged quite looong.... Nothing interesting for more than 1 hour in movie.... The characters have not been given much Punch. The graphics are good but not the Best. This is nowhere near Lord of the Rings. Last but not least, the WAR scenes are a mess. The only best thing in the movie and it is being made the worse... Short war scenes...abrupt ending... There were so many scenes which could have been shown gigantically...to increase effect... Narnia is a "Nothing Special Narnia"... If u want to see Narnia...for great war scenes...Suggest to see Lord of Rings...1 more time in DVD...that will be good rather than watching Narnia hoping there will be some exciting scene in the movie.... (Reply to this) |
|
thadeus_79 writes: on Dec 10 2005 09:54 AM Congratulations RockStarFrank!!! (Reply to this) |
|
battlemetoc writes: on Dec 11 2005 06:09 AM In reply to this comment (#828657) [b]Memo to LOTR fans[/b] Ok...enough is enough. Complain that LWW is second rate (or worse) to LOTR among yourselves, but leave the rest of us out of it! I personally suffered thru LOTR 1, slept thru #2, and couldn't bear the thought of even going to the theater for 3. LWW...on the other hand...struck an incredibly resonant chord with me (and MANY others judging by the reviews on this site)...and I just didn't want it to end. What I remembered as a 5th grader leaped to life in the most complete sense I could imagine (yea...cgi/backgrounds showed seams, but I just didn't key on that for some reason). A great experience, that your chance of having is...oh...ZERO if you are somehow wedded to the idea that this movie must be compared one-for-one with LORT. Have that discussion somewhere else...please! (Reply to this) |
|
jeanfc writes: on Dec 11 2005 08:55 AM Narnia and Disney better hope they make a lot of cash between now and Wednesday, cause whatever is playing at the cinema is going to get killed by King Kong. (Reply to this) |
|
Elixir writes: on Dec 11 2005 09:21 AM Narnia might be the worst movie i've seen in ages. I was so mad at paying for this that i almost walked out. For me to walk out of a movie it has to be so bad, sooo bad , you might die if you stay. The last movie I walked out of was League of Extrodinary Gentlement a few years back. This is up there with that. However I did not walk out. I'm mad i paid to see this movie. (Reply to this) |
|
Now it's dark writes: on Dec 11 2005 04:46 PM Very crappy movie. Too many negative aspects to list. All I'll say is this: River rafting scene. 'Nuff said. (Reply to this) |
|
nazgul writes: on Dec 11 2005 07:32 PM [b]Narnia was GREAT!!![/b] I paid almost $80.00 in movie tickets to take my family, there is eight of us in all. We ALL loved it. My wife and I have both read the book. I read it once as a child and twice in the last few weeks. I am also one of the biggest LOTR fans. Now I thought the movie was really good, and my wife and I may go see it again. We are frequent movies goers like once to twice a week. The visuals could hve been a little better but the srtory was awesome and stuck to the book. My daughter who is almost four loved it, so did my 10, 12, 13, and 15 year old. Not many movies are going to compare to LOTR but you will never enjoy anything if you compare everything to that. I hope that KING KONG will be up ther with it though. (LOTR) I didnt think it "dragged" on at all. Like all stories it takes some time to "explain" what is happening. (Reply to this) |
|
pota1967 writes: on Dec 11 2005 08:49 PM well the movie made 67 million so it must be okay (Reply to this) |
|
Infernal writes: on Dec 11 2005 11:17 PM [b]Hmm.[/b] With Narnia, it all came down to this: For most people, if you read the book, you were disappointed because of the portrayals and the left-out stuff. If you had not read the book, you enjoyed the movie a lot(for most). And whether you read it or not, the acting was pretty bad. Or low-key, if you will. Meh, I was hoping for it to be a bit better. Well, it's not disgusting. Just not.. incredible.. Anyway, look for my journal review to be put up in the next few days. (Reply to this) |
|
mstiefan writes: on Dec 13 2005 10:04 AM [b]Book V Movie[/b] I am rereading the book now. Maybe I should stop so I can enjoy the movie :-) (Reply to this) |
|
synergyred writes: on Dec 15 2005 05:16 PM In reply to this comment (#828665) Sorry infernal, I disagree. I love the books a lot and I loved the movie as well. Yes, changes were made but I believe they were made for the best because what looks good on paper doesn't always transition as well to the screen. I went into the theater looking foreward to a good, quality film, not a page-by-page adaptation of the novel. I was very happy with it :) (Reply to this) |
| You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register. |





