RottenTomatoes.com
Log In | Register | What is RT?
Check out the new RT Community
  • Home
  • Movies
  • DVD
  • Celebrities
  • News
  • Critics
  • Trailers & Pictures
  • CommunityBeta
  • Features
  • | Columns
  • | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
help icon Enhanced RT
searches on Google
Click here to turn on enhanced search results from RT on your Google searches.
 
News
Critical Consensus: A Brave New "World," A "Step" Down, And No Screenings for "Pulse" and "Zoom"
by Tim Ryan | August 09, 2006
Discuss Article
This week at the movies, we've got Oliver Stone paying tribute to the heroes of 9/11 ("World Trade Center," starring Nicolas Cage); two youngsters trying to start a dance dance revolution ("Step Up," starring Jenna Dewan and Channing Tatum); a school for young superheroes ("Zoom," starring Tim Allen and Courteney Cox); and an evil website ("Pulse," starring Kristen Bell). What do the critics have to say?

Oliver Stone has never been the subtlest of directors, nor has he shied away from controversy or conspiracy-mongering. So it's something of a surprise to critics that with his latest, "World Trade Center," he has tackled a subject (the 9/11 attacks) rife with talk of dark machinations and created a straightforward, apolitical tale of heroism. Based on a true story, "World Trade Center" stars Nicolas Cage and Michael Pena as a pair of Port Authority police officers who became trapped in the ruins of the World Trade Center while attempting to rescue others. Critics say the narrow human focus is one of the strengths of the film, along with its stunning visuals and an old-fashioned sense of resilience and heroism. At 70 percent on the Tomatometer, "World Trade Center" may be a cut below Paul Greengrass' 9/11 film "United 93" (90 percent), but it's a worthy examination of a day that will live in infamy. It's also Stone's best-reviewed film since "Nixon."


Nicolas Cage as real-life officer John McLoughlin in "World Trade Center"

"Step Up" tells the story of a hip-hop dancer from the wrong side of the tracks (Channing Tatum) and a privileged ballerina (Jenna Dewan) who overcome their differences to make beautiful music together on the dance floor. Sound familiar? It should, if you've seen "Saturday Night Fever," "Save the Last Dance," or "Dirty Dancing." Perhaps the Bee Gees presciently spoke for the critics of "Step Up" when they sang, "You should be dancing," for the scribes say the film is at its best in its electrifying dance sequences, but dramatically flat otherwise. At 21 percent on the Tomatometer, the critics are putting this baby in a corner.


"Step Up": Do fries come with that shake?

The studios apparently believe "Pulse" is pretty lifeless, and that "Zoom" is full of cinematic gloom. What else could explain the fact that the Kristen Bell J-horror remake and the Tim Allen superhero comedy, respectively, were not screened for critics? It's time to bust out those crystal balls and guess those Tomatometers, people.


"Sometimes when we touch/ the horror's just too much"

Also in theaters this week, in limited release: "Half Nelson," starring Ryan Gosling as a troubled inner city teacher, is at a whopping 95 percent on the Tomatometer; the Czech surrealist horror film "Lunacy" is at 80 percent; "House of Sand," a visually remarkable Brazilian epic, is at 80 percent; "Conversations With Other Women," a tale of a romantic reunion starring Helena Bonham Carter and Aaron Eckhart, is at 70 percent; "The Trouble With Men and Women," a low-budget Brit relationship drama, is at 50 percent; "Poster Boy," a drama about the gay son of a senator, is at 43 percent; and "The Ordeal," a dark Belgian horror import, is at 43 percent.

Recent Oliver Stone Movies:
-----------------------------------
16% -- Alexander (2004)
50% -- Comandante (2003)
48% -- Any Given Sunday (1999)
51% -- U-Turn (1997)
74% -- Nixon (1995)

Recent Nicolas Cage Movies:
------------------------------------
61% -- Lord of War (2005)
59% -- The Weather Man (2005)
42% -- National Treasure (2004)
82% -- Matchstick Men (2003)
90% -- Adaptation (2002)

Films Not Screened For Critics In 2006 (Best To Worst Tomatometer Score):
------------------------------------------------
28% -- Silent Hill
27% -- Tyler Perry's Madea's Family Reunion
24% -- Phat Girlz
16% -- Grandma's Boy
15% -- Underworld: Evolution
11% -- The Benchwarmers
10% -- Ultraviolet
10% -- When a Stranger Calls
7% -- Date Movie
7% -- Larry the Cable Guy: Health Inspector
6% -- See No Evil
5% -- Doogal
5% -- BloodRayne
5% -- Stay Alive

Related Items
Celeb: Oliver Stone
Jenna Dewan
Bee Gees
Tim Allen
Aaron Eckhart
Nicolas Cage
Courteney Cox
Ryan Gosling
Helena Bonham-Carter
Channing Tatum
Paul Greengrass
Kristen Bell
Michael Pena
Movie: United 93
Larry the Cable Guy: Health Inspector
See No Evil
Calvaire
Comandante
When a Stranger Calls
Lunacy
Lord of War
Ultraviolet
Zoom
Save the Last Dance
Madea's Family Reunion
Saturday Night Fever
Step Up
Alexander
Doogal
Date Movie
Silent Hill
House of Sand
Half Nelson
Adaptation
Grandma's Boy
Stay Alive
Matchstick Men
The Weather Man
Nixon
BloodRayne
Pulse
Phat Girlz
The Trouble with Men and Women
Dirty Dancing
Pulse
Underworld: Evolution
National Treasure
U-Turn
World Trade Center
Poster Boy
Bookmark and Share
Comments (1-20 of 49 posts) | Reply
the_NatureBoy_WOOOOO
the_NatureBoy_WOOOOO writes:
on Aug 09 2006 06:50 PM

Why does the better reviewed 9/11 film have to be about an incident that nobody really cares about.

(Reply to this)
knowingtoast85
knowingtoast85 writes:
on Aug 09 2006 07:30 PM

In reply to this comment (#841841)
Oooh, ouch man. You might get some responses on that one. I'm wincing just thinking about the ramifications of what you just wrote.

(Reply to this)
the_NatureBoy_WOOOOO
the_NatureBoy_WOOOOO writes:
on Aug 09 2006 08:26 PM

In reply to this comment (#841842)
Honestly though, Of course its a tragedy, but it doesn't even begin to compare to what it was like at ground zero. Not even close.

(Reply to this)
havoc_012
havoc_012 writes:
on Aug 10 2006 12:22 AM

In reply to this comment (#841841)
Those are some fightin words, boy.

But seriously, watch what you say. You gotta be a pretty cold indiviual to say that. Think of the families that lost loved ones over the incident. Think about how many more would have been lost if they didn't bring the plane down when they did.

I'm pretty sure that most people actually care...


(Reply to this)
jdobrole
jdobrole writes:
on Aug 10 2006 01:27 AM

In reply to this comment (#841841)
yeah that is probably the dumbest f**king comment anyone has ever made. The people on United 93 saved more lives than anybody that day. If it were not for them many people in washington would have died. I really just can't get over the fact of how dumb you are. I'm serious, there has to be an explanation. Maybe you're slightly retarded or something.

(Reply to this)
plremcconn
plremcconn writes:
on Aug 10 2006 02:05 AM

In reply to this comment (#841841)
Seriously man not cool, who are you to judge what was the most important part of the day , the whole issue with 9/11 is that so many people were touched by it. There are countless stories surrounding the day and I beleive your comments are an insult to the people involved.
Appreciate the film for what it is , a reflection of the impact of 9/11 on 2 men and their families, played outduring one of the worst acts of terror on american soil.


(Reply to this)
killthemall4444
killthemall4444 writes:
on Aug 10 2006 04:21 AM

In reply to this comment (#841841)
Dude no just no.

(Reply to this)
lockdicer
lockdicer writes:
on Aug 10 2006 06:27 AM

In reply to this comment (#841841)
yeah seriously that was stupider than when ebert said Speed 2 was entertaining

(Reply to this)
synergyred
synergyred writes:
on Aug 10 2006 06:53 AM

Natureboy... you better take that back of people are gonna MURDER you here.

I, personally, am not ready to see this movie. It's too soon for me. But I'm glad that Oliver Stone seems to be treating such a sensitive subject with respect.


(Reply to this)
dracus
dracus writes:
on Aug 10 2006 07:38 AM

[b]A KINDER , GENTLER OLIVER STONE[/b]

I saw 'World Trade Center' yesterday and thought that Stone did a pretty good job considering the eggshells of controversy he had to walk on to film it and he avoided the temptation of sensationalising the movie to do it.

Since I'm not an American, my only fear going into it was that it was going to be another 'Flag waving God Bless America good old boy gung ho tearjerker of a movie' and was pleased to see that it wasn't about any of that. He simply made a great little movie about the real heroes of the day; the families and the people who selfishly stepped up to the plate and sacrificed their lives trying to save those trapped inside. While the collapse of the buildings were unnerving to watch, it will be the sounds of the movie that I'll remember the most, such as the roar of the actual collapse and of the crashing sounds of those who jumped landing on the buildings overhangs. There were a number of scenes throughout the movie that Stone displayed his brilliance as a director, but it was his genuine admiration and warmth for all those affected by the tragedy that gives this movie its heart.

Is it too early for a 9/11 movie? It would be if it's about those trapped on the higher floors knowing they were going to die, but it isn't too early to make a solid movie about hope and faith and that's exactly what World Trade Center is. Maybe it does plays more like a Ron Howard movie than an Oliver Stone movie, but there's no denying one thing, Oliver Stone is back; albeit kinder and gentler.


(Reply to this)
Prog5000
Prog5000 writes:
on Aug 10 2006 07:52 AM

In reply to this comment (#841841)
In the UK we still get alot of references made to the twin towers, it was a very big deal and people all over the world lost friends or family when those planes flew into the towers.

(Reply to this)
unbreakable_samurai
unbreakable_samurai writes:
on Aug 10 2006 10:20 AM

I thought that it was a very good movie, well directed and acted. The 2nd best film of the year so far.

(Reply to this)
Zen Bullet
Zen Bullet writes:
on Aug 10 2006 10:26 AM

The film wasn't very good. Which is ironic, because you'd think the "ground zero" story would have had more potential than "United 93".

"World Trade Center" was an exercise in "waiting", really. There wasn't a dramtic storyline. It was like watching a bunch of characters "hanging out" and, well, waiting. There was minimal character-growth, much less inspired development.

Many of the technical qualities(cinematography, sound) were good. But considering the location and the event, the effects weren't too impressive, and neither was the spectacle. So naturally, if the "spectacle" of ground zero wasn't going to be front and center, you'd expect the story itelf to be powerful(like "United 93"), but that wasn't the case here.

Blame the script. Everybody else did good work(the actors, the crew, the music and sound teams) . . . but there wasn't a dramatic story to draw our attention . . . which make the movie something of a bellyflop.

I wish I could write off my dissappointment because of the subject matter(like so many critics seem to have done), but to be honest, it's not a very good film. It isn't as emotionally forced as the trailer hinted, but it doesn't mine the potential that it could have.

"United 93", despite being quite a small film, was perfect for what it was trying to be. It deserves Best Picture and Best Director nominations for sure. "World Trade Center", however, is like a more bloated, aimless, cousin to it.


(Reply to this)
woot
woot writes:
on Aug 10 2006 10:49 AM

Most of the evidence points to 93 being shot down, so the people on board may have accomplished nothing.

Before you flame me, even the mainstream media has finally started reporting some of the government's deception about what really happened that day, so do some research.


(Reply to this)
dracus
dracus writes:
on Aug 10 2006 11:36 AM

In reply to this comment (#841854)
Oh for Christ's sake, give this conspiracy shit a break. It was a terrorist attack from Bin Laden and friends, nothing more. Besides, if it was an inside job, Oliver Stone and Michael Moore would have been all over it like stink on a Bush, er, I mean monkey.

(Reply to this)
the_NatureBoy_WOOOOO
the_NatureBoy_WOOOOO writes:
on Aug 10 2006 11:39 AM

[b]My point is....[/b]
On 9/11, everyone was glued to their televisions in shock while watching the twin towers up in smoke. It was the scariest event in american history. Firefighters and police officers did everything they could without considering their own safety. In all the madness that day in New York City, there was also beauty, because all these men and women risked their lives to save perfect strangers when they could've just as easily ran away. Now this is a story that deserves a 5 star treatment, and the isolated incident that was Flight 93, pales in comparison. Im sorry, but it really does.


(Reply to this)
aknddon3
aknddon3 writes:
on Aug 10 2006 11:50 AM

In reply to this comment (#841854)
[b]You are an idiot[/b]
Keep believing what little 14 year old boys tell you online while the rest of us with our own brains can see how retarded you are.


(Reply to this)
the_NatureBoy_WOOOOO
the_NatureBoy_WOOOOO writes:
on Aug 10 2006 01:08 PM

Saying that nobody cares about United 93 was harsh, but I was pi$$ed off. You all know that ground zero was a far worse tragedy than Flight 93. The people on Flight 93 knew they were going to die, anyone with an ounce of courage would do the same thing. I am greatful for what they did, but it just doesn't even come close to ground zero.

Do you realize that ground zero had over 3000 deaths while Flight 93 maybe had around 20. People were jumping out of the towers and we saw those horrible images on television. The sound of a firetruck will forever haunt me after 9/11. The brave men and women at ground zero had a choice. They could've just as easily went home that day. But they choose to risk their lives on the most horrifying day in american history. Now that is admirable. I'm sure you all can see why I think that the story at ground zero is far more deserving of a 5 star treatment.


(Reply to this)
illinoise
illinoise writes:
on Aug 10 2006 02:02 PM

In reply to this comment (#841858)
united 93 was a tribute to the sacrifice that a few people made to prevent the deaths of hundreds, maybe thousands, of others. it was not trying to say that the plane crash was "more of a tragedy" than the attack on the world trade centers. and it is not an isolated event. it is completely connected to the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon. it was perpetrated by the same terrorist group on the same day as those attacks. if your point is that WTC should have been a better movie because more people died than on flight United 93, then i think you are missing the point of both movies. it's really a trivial complaint. basically, you're saying "this movie should have been better," which can be said about any movie.

(Reply to this)
godinanalcove
godinanalcove writes:
on Aug 10 2006 02:04 PM

[b]hey you bastards[/b]
hey we are the west we care, if it happens somewhere else we dont care. why is 9/11 so important. in the past 5 years we (USA, brit) did and doing more damage than 9/11. yes i am as cold as natureboy, so murder me. just look at the middle east and lebanon, it is a mess. that is worst than 9/11. maybe if we (usa, brit) get nuke, cities destroy, thounsands of american and brits die. oh wait, never mind, we didnt do anything with new orleans.


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1 2 3
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.

Related Links

Oliver Stone
  • Pictures
  • News
  • Filmography
  • Forum

Related Articles

  • Frank Langella Moves to Wall Street Opens in new window (5)
  • Josh Brolin Joining Wall Street Sequel? Opens in new window (5)
  • Stone, Douglas on Board for Wall Street Sequel Opens in new window (5)
  • RT Interview: Gus van Sant and Dustin Lance Black on Milk (1)
  • Oliver Stone Eyes Chavez Doc Opens in new window (9)
  • Video Exclusive: Josh Brolin and Elizabeth Banks on W. (4)
  • UK Critics Consensus: Was W. Wicked? Is Pride & Glory Proud and Glorious? (0)
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Moviegoers to Feel the Payne (7)
  • Oliver Stone Looks Back, Moves Forward, Speaks Out Opens in new window (35)
  • Escobar Biopic Collapses, Sparks Lawsuit Opens in new window (1)

Most Discussed

  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (162)
  • Critics Consensus: New Moon Wanes (129)
  • Tomatometer Watch: Will Twilight's New Moon Dazzle? (97)
  • Total Recall: Star-Crossed Lovers (74)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (53)
  • Five Favorite Films with Werner Herzog (50)
  • Total Recall: John Travolta's Best Movies (36)
  • Friday Harvest: New Moon, Avatar, and more! (31)
  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (3)
  • Ho, ho, ho! It's RT's Great Big Gift Guide! (0)

Latest News

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (3)
  • Total Recall: John Travolta's Best Movies (37)
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: New Moon Shatters Records (162)
  • Weekly Ketchup: Idris Elba cast in Thor, more Spider-Man 4 rumors (53)
  • Ho, ho, ho! It's RT's Great Big Gift Guide! (0)
  • Friday Harvest: New Moon, Avatar, and more! (31)
  • Critics Consensus: New Moon Wanes (129)
  • Total Recall: Star-Crossed Lovers (75)
  • Tomatometer Watch: Will Twilight's New Moon Dazzle? (97)
  • Five Favorite Films with Werner Herzog (50)

Latest Interviews

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (3)
  • Eric Bana talks Love the Beast - RT Interview (8)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
  • James Schamus talks Taking Woodstock - RT Interview (6)
  • John Hurt Talks Harry Potter, Quentin Crisp and Alien - The RT Interview (15)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (16)
  • Wes Anderson Talks Fantastic Mr. Fox - RT Interview (8)
  • Wolverine Creator Len Wein Talks About the Film (28)
  • Gavin Hood Talks Wolverine; Possible Sequel (28)
  • Duncan Jones talks Moon, Sam Rockwell, and Mute (14)

Latest Features

  • "I Don't Hate Women": Lars von Trier on Antichrist (3)
  • Fight Club Sound Designer Reflects on Film's 10th Anniversary (19)
  • Five Favourite Films with Ang Lee (34)
  • 10 Movies That Changed The (End Of The) World (32)
  • Ho-ho-horror! 10 Scary Christmas Movies (39)
  • 12 Facts About 2012 (135)
  • RT's Movie Location Guide - London as Elsewhere (0)
  • Terry Gilliam Talks Doctor Parnassus (16)
  • Five Favourite Films with 24's Carlos Bernard (33)
  • Six Horrible Part Sixes (32)

Sponsored Links

 
 
About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Celebs List| Newsletter
IGN Logo

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive | Green Pixels


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2009, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.