ROTTEN TOMATOES: Teri Polo is Expecting a "Little Focker"

Teri Polo is Expecting a "Little Focker"

by Scott Weinberg | February 01, 2007

Don't even pretend to be surprised when I tell you that a movie called "Meet the Little Focker" is on its way. Don't even try it.

Yes, that's right. A second sequel in the series that includes "Meet the Parents" and "Meet the Fockers." We can only assume that this new one involves Ben Stiller and Teri Polo as new parents.

Ms. Polo, as a matter of fact, is the one who recently spilled the beans (to the Associated Press) about the new sequel's title. That's pretty much all the news we have on this project thus far, but thanks to ComingSoon.net for sharing it. It seems a safe bet that Ben Stiller, Robert De Niro, and Blythe Danner will be back, and probably Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand, too. But the most important cast member in the whole series has to be the cat who sits on the toilet. People really seem to love that gag.

And before you type something like "Dear Lord, WHY?" in the comments section, be sure to stop by the "Fockers" page and check out the box office returns. That's why.

Related Items

Movie:	Meet the Fockers
Celeb:	Blythe Danner
	Robert De Niro
	Dustin Hoffman
	Ben Stiller
	Barbra Streisand
	Teri Polo

(1-19 of 19 posts) | Reply

gerke writes:
on Feb 01 2007 04:16 AM

well it only made some couple of 100's of milions of dollars but the dollar isn't as strong as it used to be.

(Reply to this)

South_park300 writes:
on Feb 01 2007 05:07 AM

well, i liked the sequel better than the first movie, which is rare...so who knows

(Reply to this)

Murrow100 writes:
on Feb 01 2007 08:22 AM

Yeah, it will make money and yeah I will go see it . . .
What about Own Wilson?

(Reply to this)

Defmonkey writes:
on Feb 01 2007 08:43 AM

Its kinda odd to see a movie with Ben Stiller without Owen Wilson.

(Reply to this)

zeromark16 writes:
on Feb 01 2007 08:49 AM

Why do they need to do this to us?

(Reply to this)

Kid_Ikarus writes:
on Feb 01 2007 10:03 AM

both of these movies happened to be very funny, so we'll see...

(Reply to this)

Sadistik writes:
on Feb 01 2007 10:10 AM

Dear Lord, WHY!?!?!?!

(Reply to this)

dagreenman18 writes:
on Feb 01 2007 01:24 PM

i say why not. it's not like it's gonna bomb. the series has made a fuck ton of money. so yeah, we'll see. i like the title it's fun to say.

(Reply to this)

ck100 writes:
on Feb 01 2007 02:18 PM

How many times can you do a joke on the whole "Focker" name? I think it would get repetitive by this film. Besides, what possible creative reason could there be for this movie to exist? It will end up just rehashing the first two movies and have nothing new to offer. This is only being done for financial reasons.

(Reply to this)

SolidChamp writes:
on Feb 01 2007 03:01 PM

I'm absolutely baffled that some of you would be brave enough to post a POSITIVE opinion on "Meet the Fockers"! It was one of the most God awful movies I have ever seen in my life, easily makes my top ten worst of all time (I actually sat through The Last Action Hero...I didn't sit through this), and is an insult to my intelligence. The first one was good. Seeing it for the first time, I had a great time and laughed quite a bit. The movie gets a little old after a while, but I could live with that. But then they have to go and make one of the worst sequels in the history of bad sequels. Ugh. The movie made me want to vomit. It was a completely different film from the first one. They were trying way too hard. The jokes were either recycled or far too juvenile (how many poop jokes were there?), and the acting was so over the top, it just wasn't funny! Some of you LIKED THIS MOVIE??? Go and have your head examined. Nobody is going to see this third film, which will be twice as absurd as the previous film, with twice as many poop jokes I'm sure of it. God help us all. I honestly did not know that they were making this...and I'm sorry I found out.

(Reply to this)

SolidChamp writes:
on Feb 01 2007 03:13 PM

This one critic said it best in his review...I couldn't have put it better myself...

http://www.efilmcritic.com/review.php?movie=11362&reviewer=128

(Reply to this)

TheGreatOne13 writes:
on Feb 01 2007 05:59 PM

The first one was a classic and the second one wasnt...Damn leave it to money to get a sequel made

(Reply to this)

synergyred writes:
on Feb 01 2007 07:55 PM

Ugh. Totally unneeded.

(Reply to this)

S0BeURself writes:
on Feb 02 2007 08:40 AM

[b]whats the problem?[/b]
it's so lame when people act like they've been personally affronted by a movie they didnt like. guess what, enough people found it funny enough to warrant another sequel, so get over it. dont like it? dont watch it. I liked both, and ill be there for the third. sometimes i go to the theater just to laugh at potty jokes. . . i promise, the world isn't going to end.

(Reply to this)

puablo writes:
on Feb 02 2007 09:12 AM

Still better than the prospect of the Hulk 2.

(Reply to this)

cgcbooks writes:
on Feb 02 2007 07:12 PM

Jay Roach should be working on another Austin Powers film instead.

(Reply to this)

Infernal writes:
on Feb 03 2007 12:04 PM

I loved Meet the Parents. But I absolutely was AMAZED at how amazing Meet the Fockers was. I found myself watching Meet the Fockers on HBO for probably the twentieth time, wanting more, wanting a sequel.

I simply cannot wait. I only wonder if production has started or if they're just in pre-production, or what.. I doubt they're in production right now, however, unless they're incredibly amazing at keeping things on the down-low.

(Reply to this)

Scott Weinberg writes:
on Feb 03 2007 03:50 PM

In reply to this comment (#854565)
Aw, thanks mom! ;)

(Reply to this)

Vitamin M writes:
on Feb 06 2007 09:20 AM

In reply to this comment (#854570)
he is working on another Austin Powers film.

(Reply to this)