ROTTEN TOMATOES: Teaser Bulletin: "National Treasure: Book of Secrets" Comments

Teaser Bulletin: "National Treasure: Book of Secrets"

by Scott Weinberg | May 25, 2007

Summary

With almost $350 million in worldwide box office, you knew it was only a matter of time before "National Treasure" earned a sequel. That time is December 21st. Back to Article

(1-26 of 26 posts) | Reply

jeremyd4 writes:
on May 25 2007 01:26 AM

What exactly did you find promising about that considering you found the last bit to be groan inducing -- because from what I saw the rest of the teaser is just twirling graphics and bright lights???

(Reply to this)

xaviusjudge writes:
on May 25 2007 02:20 AM

I hate it when movies become too unbelievable. Like, for instance, Transporter 2. The first one was cool, but in an attempt to outdo an already over-the-top film, they destroy a movie that needed no sequel at all. It's all about money though. Anyways my point is, I really hope NT2 doesn't dissapoint me like some other sequels.

(Reply to this)

Xavier Telouran writes:
on May 25 2007 05:49 AM

Why do they have to keep breaking the law? Honestly, you'd think the billions of dollars they found last time would give them some leeway...

(Reply to this)

Elixor writes:
on May 25 2007 06:05 AM

The whole first movie causes me to groan outloud. There's no way I'm going to see the sequel. Especially since they'll projectile vomit the same garbage out that made the first one so "successful". Complete garbage.

(Reply to this)

Typhoon20 writes:
on May 25 2007 06:05 AM

Fairly promising ? What are you smoking ?

Awful trailer, and the movie looks awful too. Same ol sh!t
different place.

(Reply to this)

dracus writes:
on May 25 2007 07:50 AM

Bury it now before Wal Mart buries it in the bargain bin.

(Reply to this)

Crenshaw writes:
on May 25 2007 08:57 AM

I caught the 1st movie on DVD and I took the advice of one of the reviewers: just turn your brain off and accept it as pure candy. And because I did that it was a heck of a lot of fun. If you go into a film like this expecting realism then you are fooling yourself. I'll add it to my NetFlix queue.

(Reply to this)

skasforfags writes:
on May 25 2007 08:58 AM

I'll catch it on USA Network in 3 years.

(Reply to this)

arpeggio191 writes:
on May 25 2007 10:24 AM

will this be better or worse than Angels and Demons? Cause the first one was better than the da vinci code. (but the movie still suuuuucked)

(Reply to this)

Warheart1188 writes:
on May 25 2007 10:58 AM

There was a full trailer for this movie last night at the Pirates premier. Looks.well.....eh.

(Reply to this)

blank blank writes:
on May 25 2007 11:05 AM

Didnt lincoln die 300 years ago? let it go people!

nic cage has to stop doing these commerical movies, because every one of them sucks ass (lately, because for my money, face off and the rock are highly enjoyable action flicks. con air... not so much)....

lets recap his last couple of commercial movies: next (sucked), ghost rider (sucked), national treasure (sucked), national treasure 2 (sure to suck, the wicker man (sucked)... he's clearly a good (great sometimes) actor in the right role, like adaptaion, leaving las vegas, i liked him alot in lord of war, but then he goes and drops a deuce like next.

somebody has to do a better job of picking his projects. (although, to be fair, if bruckhiemer waved a 15 mil check in my face for national treasure 2, it would be kind of hard to say no)

(Reply to this)

thetruebastard writes:
on May 25 2007 11:16 AM

Jesus Christ. If you can honestly enjoy these movies, there's something seriously wrong with you. I bet National Treasure fans all have this dream of doing commercials for Reebok, too.

(Reply to this)

skasforfags writes:
on May 25 2007 11:50 AM

In reply to this comment (#867035)
You can't knock a guy for making bank.

(Reply to this)

okuonuora writes:
on May 25 2007 12:49 PM

In reply to this comment (#867036)
I have dreams of doing your mom.

(Reply to this)

aknddon3 writes:
on May 25 2007 01:38 PM

In reply to this comment (#867035)
So your opinion means shit, never talk again. Continue to believe what you want but alot of people liked those movies and their opinions are valid, yours are not.

(Reply to this)

aknddon3 writes:
on May 25 2007 01:39 PM

In reply to this comment (#867036)
You sound like a loser that liked Superman Returns so your opinion is void.

(Reply to this)

IMAmoose24 writes:
on May 25 2007 03:42 PM

I'm suprised that Nic Cage didn't start freaking out when he saw all that yellow and black in the beginning of the trailer. NOT THE BEES! NO! NOT THE BEES!!!

(Reply to this)

Metafact writes:
on May 25 2007 05:46 PM

Oh god, that looks terrible!

(Reply to this)

killermonkey8822 writes:
on May 26 2007 12:26 PM

why did the first film do so good at the box office anyway? it sucked........ i can't even remember why i saw it in the first place.

(Reply to this)

Merlin235 writes:
on May 26 2007 12:34 PM

It didn't look too bad to me. I enjoyed the first one. It's nice to be able to go to a movie and not have to endure language, sex, violence in mass quantities. This trailer wasn't THAT impressive, but I'll probably go see it. People on here are just trying to one-up eachother with who can make the cathiest hate-phrase.

(Reply to this)

highdough writes:
on May 26 2007 01:48 PM

I meant to see this when it first came out and was called DaVinci Code.

(Reply to this)

highdough writes:
on May 26 2007 01:51 PM

They might shortsheet the Pope's bed!! Ha, ha, ha, ha. Whew! That was a good one.

(Reply to this)

Holly Jolly writes:
on May 27 2007 11:49 PM

Sadly this has a better chance of being better then Pirates 2 and 3.

What is worse then a sequel? Sequels filmed together to save money!

(Reply to this)

highdough writes:
on May 28 2007 02:04 PM

In reply to this comment (#867047)
Hold on. Back to the Futur...., well Matrix....well. Never mind.

(Reply to this)

kfarschman writes:
on May 28 2007 10:01 PM

In reply to this comment (#867044)
I hate when I have to endure language, sex, and violence......wait no I don't.

You know what I can't endure. When the movie industry so obviously tries to whore itself out to the lowest common denominator with unneeded, horrendous sequels that are made with no care, integrity, or effort just to make money.

(Reply to this)

Bigbrother writes:
on Jun 01 2007 04:53 AM

I'm certainly no Nic Cage fan, but I really enjoyed the first one. It's a good movie for history nerds because it's got enough decent story to keep you interested while still having enough laughable elements for us to expound upon with "That's not true, this is what really happened..." and feel superior to people who don't know. and lets face it that's really what we want.

(Reply to this)

Related Links

Jon Turteltaub

Related Articles

Most Discussed

Latest News

Latest Interviews

Latest Features

Sponsored Links