Werner Herzog on Rescue Dawn: The RT Interview
The controversial and almost mythological helmer tells us about his latest.
At age 65, prolific filmmaker Werner Herzog shows no signs of taking things a bit easier. Notorious for his gruelling filmmaking style, he's famously willing to put himself through everything he demands of his actors. This led to a series of outrageous on-set experiences with eccentric star Klaus Kinski, which Herzog documented in My Best Fiend, following their often murderous relationship over the years. Herzog is the only filmmaker who has shot features on every continent. His classics include Aguirre: Wrath of God, Nosferatu, Fitzcarraldo, Cobra Verde and Grizzly Man, and he also finds time to act in the films of Harmony Korine. In addition to his film career, he walked on foot from Munich to Paris in 1974, was shot during an interview by journalist Mark Kermode in 2005, and rescued Joaquin Phoenix from a terrible car crash the following year. Now with Rescue Dawn, he returns to the subject of his 1997 documentary Little Dieter Wants to Fly...
When you finished the doc Little Dieter Wants to Fly, what did you think still needed to be said in a constructed narrative?
Werner Herzog: For Dieter and me it was always clear that this was unfinished business. Too many things that are really fascinating - such as what happened in the prison camp - are hardly touched in the documentary. The films complement each other very well. There was also a consensus between Dieter and me that the feature film comes first, but since technically we did it later, interestingly, the film that was not done yet influenced the first film. But in its heart the feature film has always been the first one.
Why did you wait almost 10 years to make the feature?
WH: Well, it was possible to make the feature film only when the money was available. Otherwise I would have done the feature as the first one. But the feature film in that case would have been unfinished business, because we would have seen nothing of Dieter's childhood, nor do we see anything about his life later on, nor do we see the real man. And of course his story was fantastic before he made it to the United States and Southeast Asia, and equally afterwards. He had four more plane crashes that he survived, and children and wives and just totally wild stuff. [Dengler died at age 62 in February 2001 of Lou Gehrig's Disease, and was buried in Arlington National Cemetery in Washington DC.]
How was Christian Bale suited to the role?
WH: The simple answer: He's the best of his generation. And I worked with the best of their generation: Steve Zahn, Christian Bale and Jeremy Davies. So I was blessed with the best of the best. With Steve Zahn, nobody expected anything from him like that because he's mostly been the funny sidekick in Eddie Murphy movies. But I knew that Steve has something very, very special about him.
Did you cast Bale partly because of his reputation with things like extreme weight loss?
WH: Yes, but we had to be careful. Christian always said, "For God's sake, let's not make a great fuss about this." Because he didn't want to end up in the Guinness Book of World Records for starving himself. Of course in The Machinist he lost much more. And what we did was significant and visible for an audience, so that by the end of the film he has quite visibly lost some weight. And that's fine. And we shouldn't make a big fuss about it. It only showed the amount of dedication and professionality of everyone involved. And that's the key to it.
But then Bale's dedication extended to eating maggots...
WH: That's not really incredible. I've seen people in other country eat maggots, and they're very rich in protein. So there's nothing really wrong about it. In our own cultural context we're not accustomed to eating maggots, but Christian Bale always knew I would essentially offer to do things I asked from the actors. For example, when we were in the rapids, I spent all day with them in the water. I offered to eat a couple of spoonfuls of maggots, but in this case Christian said, "Oh for God's sake, just turn on the camera and let me get on with it."

Was it just one take?
WH: That was one of only two misunderstandings. One was when we were a few hundred yards apart and we had to yell over a large distance and something got lost, and for a moment we were angry with each other, but it was over in two minutes flat. And then that moment when he ate the maggots, I had told him, "You are the one who will stop the scene." But while he ate - he probably didn't hear it correctly - he kept eating, eating, eating, and he got kind of angry because I never said cut. So finally when the four minutes of film had run out, and everybody stopped, he said he didn't hear cut from me. And that was the second moment where there was a kind of misunderstanding, but these things pass by so quickly. It's just a little error. But, for example, in solidarity I lost half the amount of weight he lost. It would be counterproductive to lose the same amount because he would gain it back fairly quickly. The real challenge - because we shot the film backwards - was to develop the character backwards. To find the dynamic and the flow was quite difficult.
Why do that?
WH: Well it was a practical consideration. It takes you five or six months to lose weight but you gain it back in two or four weeks. We could have done it the other way around, but then we would have needed five or six months of shooting, and we only had 44 days. And while you are working, he would have to keep starving, starving, starving, until at the end he was very thin. So for practical reasons we had to do it backwards. Christian has been such a disciplined man. Jeremy Davies in a way overdid it. He's quite thin, but he arrived in Thailand with quite a few very large suitcases, and it turned out they were filled with bottled water, Evian in plastic bottles. And in Thailand, right next to the hotel in the supermarket you could have bought the same ones. But he brought all his water along - he was totally wild. He ate very, very little and mostly only drank water, and that was that.
Can Christian play any character? Do you think he could even play Kinski in a biopic?
WH: No, that would be ridiculous! He couldn't do it - no, because Kinski was kind of unique and you can't even imitate him! Not anything. It would be wrong for him to do, for example, Kinski. Or it would be wrong for him to do Mohammad Ali. In a way I had to stop Christian from going into too much of an imitation of the real Dieter Dengler. The real Dieter Dengler had a very thick German accent, and Christian and I were quite clear: we had to dismiss that. We did not try to imitate that - just a slight hint of an accent. Christian kept saying to me, "You as a crowd won't even hear it!" It's so subtle. I think he could do pretty much anything, but he shouldn't do everything. In essence, yes, but you do not imitate idiosyncrasies and actions in the same way as, for example, when you make a film about Mohammad Ali, you have to be a rapper, like Ali, and you have to dance in the ring, and you have to be like him. And Richard Nixon - you have to look pretty much alike, and you have to speak like him and move like him.
|
on Nov 19 2007 09:19 AM Fanastic interview guys! It's nice to hear Herzog finally address the issue of Eugene DeBruin. You asked him some great questions, Rich! (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 19 2007 09:51 AM I hope Zahn gets an Oscar nomination. He was amazing in this. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 19 2007 10:53 AM I'm not as impressed with this interview as arendr. Herzog's explanation for Christian Bale's lack of a German accent made no sense, and his excuse for DeBruin being portrayed as a psycho is pathetic. Sure Dieter said different things to you off-camera, Herzog, I guess that's why OFFICIAL BRIEFINGS WITH DENGLER AND CORRESPONDING TESTIMONY FROM PISIDHI INDRADAT describe Eugene DeBruin as a noble and selfless leader during his time in the prison. But Dieter told YOU the real story. Well, since he tragically died of Lou Gehrig's Disease in 2001, I guess we'll never truly know. This so-called "internet campaign" against poor Mr. Herzog Werner Herzong, you should be ashamed of yourself for twisting the facts to fit your perception of what really happened, and in the process smearing the reputation of two great men who were just as heroic as Dieter was in that prison. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 19 2007 11:25 AM I think a lot of Herzog fans know that when you watch one of his films (even his documentaries), you're not getting the literal truth. It's more of an internal, emotional truth. Unfortunately, some people feel hurt by this. But it's really just his filmmaking style. I guess a lot of people don't get this, but this is part of the reason Herzog is not a mainstream filmmaker. I don't know what to say, because I do feel sorry for the families. But I am also very fond of the film. It is what it is. Could Herzog have made DeBruin's character more loyal? Perhaps, but the character in the film also serves to highlight the awful conditions these men lived through. I don't think anyone thinks less of Gene, because they all know he's been through a difficult ordeal. Unfortunately some people won't be able to distinguish between the real life Gene and the character portrayed in the movie. And that's a shame. As far as the accent goes, I personally thought Bale nailed the voice. But once again it's about building a character within the world that the film creates, not in real life. People don't seem to understand that images can lie just as much as they can tell the truth. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 19 2007 12:51 PM Werner Herzog is the greatest living filmmaker in the world today, but what really elevates his status in my mind, is that he is a true adventurer. This man has traveled to the farthest, most dangerous corners of the world and back, and somehow managed to live to tell the tale, again and again. He doesn't just make films, he literally LIVES them (alongside his cast). There are "moviemakers" then there are "filmmakers". Herzog is the latter, and a dying breed. It's a shame his work hasn't been recognized in the past by the Oscars, and other award ceremonies, and that his name isn't more well known by more casual moviegoers. He is among the greatest of filmmakers in the history of his country, and deserves to be mentioned in the same breath as Murnau, Lang, and Fassbinder. I encourage anyone who hasn't seen his documentary "In the Land of Silence and Darkness" or his films "The Enigma of Kasper Hauser" and "Strozek". They are truly one of a kind, timeless, and bordering on mystical, as are several of his collaborations with Kinski (including: Aguirre: The Wrath of God, Nosferatu the Vampyre, and Fitzcarraldo). (Reply to this) |
![]() on Nov 19 2007 01:42 PM Newsflash: Movies aren't reality. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 19 2007 03:13 PM This movie was incredible. Great interview too! Love the part about Christian getting ticked about the maggots. Hehe. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 19 2007 04:51 PM In reply to this comment (#1288584) If you're looking for truth within a filmed dramatization, I'm afraid you're looking in the wrong place. It's the same tired argument used against films like "The Deer Hunter" or "Heaven's Gate" or any dramatization of a historical time, place, or figure. You may disagree with the choices Herzog made-- it's debatable whether those choices achieved the ultimate dramatic goals sought-- but to harangue him for not following the "truth" to the "T" is pointless. In most cases, the subjective "truth" is not nearly as interesting as the dramatic "truth". I trust I'm not the only one who's pointed that out to you, and certainly not going to be the last. Regardless, I wish all parties well. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 19 2007 06:40 PM I am well aware of the fact that Rescue Dawn is merely a film adaptation of the true events and therefore artistic liberties must be taken. If there were inaccuracies in certain events, or character interaction, or the role of Dieter in the escape, I'm fine with that. I understand that this isn't a documentary. BUT tarnishing the memory of someone who was just as instrumental as the survivor was in the escape SIMPLY because he wasn't lucky enough to survive is inexcusable. Tell me, what purpose does making Eugene DeBruin a nutjob serve the purpose of the film? Why is it necessary to represent lies and misinformation to an already grieving family? What if you were Eugene's brother or father, would you have accepted the excuse that "it's just a movie" knowing from dozens of documented testimony that Eugene was just as heroic as Dengler? If anything, portraying Eugene and Duane accurately would have been MORE inspirational. It would have shown the resilience of people under years of tremendous pressure and torment. But Werner Herzog didn't go that route. He decided to make just one man the hero, and why? Because he was the survivor. He lived and the others (except Pisidhi Indradat, who also detested this film) died. Wow, what a great message Herzog. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 20 2007 08:09 AM In reply to this comment (#1290377) Nothing is going to change your mind or alter your opinion one way or the other on this matter. Your cup is full. Clearly you don't care for the Herzog's handling of anything in the film and that's tainted your view of Herzog, especially on a personal level. But we have a difference of opinion: you see it as tarnishing someone's memory, that someone is served up as a "nutjob". I didn't see it that way at all. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 20 2007 09:49 AM Well, I just hope that YOU don't have a family member go MIA during a war and then see some pretentious filmmaker depict him as Charles Manson. (Reply to this) |
![]() on Nov 20 2007 02:32 PM Funny enough, Davies played Manson in another film. But seriously, Bardego. What part of Herzog's explanation wasn't clear to you? I'll make it simple: 1. This is Dengler's movie. His point of you. He was there. You weren't. I'd trust Dengler before anybody else. 2. Herzog doesn't disagree and get all whiney about your point (unlike how you get with his). He respects how you feel, but he understands that the movie isn't about DeBruin. Nobody else is complaining about any of the other characters. People just want to make a name for themselves. Seriously. Get over it. Herzog doesn't look for "truth" as you call it. Pay attention to him. Listen to what he has to say. THINK. Use that brain of yours. Herzog looks for the "ecstatic truth". Look at both sides equally before you start screaming like a little girl about how some nice dude who went psycho in a Loas Internment Camp is being unfairly portrayed in a film that has almost absolutely nothing to do with him personally. (Reply to this) |
![]() on Nov 20 2007 05:37 PM In reply to this comment (#1291607) This almost happened to me once. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 20 2007 08:16 PM In reply to this comment (#1291607) Hyperbole is not your friend in this case. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 21 2007 02:36 PM *rolls eyes* Typical film school arguments defending the almighty art-house director against the evil families of a POW. Yeah, how dare I question your hero? By the way, Dengler would probably be just as disgusted as I am with Rescue Dawn, since both he and Indradat describe Eugene the same way. Don't believe me? Go to www.rescuedawnthetruth.com to see actual video interviews and documents clearly showing that the events played out in Rescue Dawn were mostly bull****. So your argument that this is "Dengler's point of view" is pathetic and insulting to the man. Geez, you guys are just as sad as Herzog. So go ahead and defend him all you want, it's easy to do it right now since he isn't smearing your reputation. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 22 2007 01:56 PM I'm so glad Rescue Dawn is coming out on DVD next week! Maybe the best film I've watched this year... (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 22 2007 02:00 PM In reply to this comment (#1296241) That's right, it's already out on DVD. Great! (Reply to this) |
![]() on Nov 23 2007 03:29 PM In reply to this comment (#1296241) You must be some kind of sad film student. Don't you know that every time someone buys this DVD, Charley Manson and Werner Herzog kill the puppy of an ex-POW's entire family. It's true. Google it. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 24 2007 02:26 PM That's not true! Werner Herzog is infallible, he can do no wrong! Whatever he puts on film is totally true, even though evidence says otherwise. (Reply to this) |
|
on Nov 24 2007 04:00 PM In reply to this comment (#1302420) You must have missed the newsflash: Movies still aren't reality. (Reply to this) |
Related Links
Related Articles
- RT on DVD: Live Free or Hairspray This Thanksgiving 3
- Werner Herzog on Rescue Dawn: The RT Interview 26
- Box Office Guru Wrapup: The Simpsons Movie Gobbles Up $72M Opening 41
- Critical Consensus: Woo-Hoo! Simpsons Is Certified Fresh; No Reservations Is Bland; Rescue Dawn Shines 10
- Box Office Guru Preview: Mmmmmmmmmmm Box Office Feast! 11
- Box Office Guru Wrapup: "Transformers" Stomps on Foes To Capture #1 Spot With $152.5M Opening 51
- Critical Consensus: "License" is Revoked, "Transformers" About as Much as Meets the Eye 6
Most Discussed
- Steven Spielberg's Ten Best-Directed Films 90
- Uwe Boll's Five Favorite Films 83
- Fahrenheit 9/11 Sequel News 49
- Box Office Guru Wrapup: Iron Man Rocks, Speed Racer Stalls 45
- George Lucas - A Super-Producer's History 43
- Peter Segal Talks About His Five Fave Films 36
- Indiana Jonesin': The Best of Harrison Ford 31
- Nicolas Cage to Play Bad Lieutenant 23
- Total Recall: Our Favorite Talking Animals 19
- David Lynch and Werner Herzog Plan Horror Film 19
Latest News
- Steven Spielberg's Ten Best-Directed Films 90
- Weekly Ketchup: A-Team casting rumors, Scorsese meets Sinatra 6
- Trailer Bulletin: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor 12
- Cannes 2008: Jeff Vespa Premieres Nosebleed with David Arquette 0
- Cannes 2008 Exclusive: Michel Gondry Joins Babelgum Jury 1
- Critics Consensus: Prince Caspian is Movie Royalty 16
- Nicolas Cage to Play Bad Lieutenant 23
- Point Breaking News: A Sequel in the Works 18
- Fahrenheit 9/11 Sequel News 49
- RT Interview: Kat Dennings on Charlie Bartlett, Nick and Norah and Death 3
Latest Interviews
- RT Interview: Kat Dennings on Charlie Bartlett, Nick and Norah and Death 3
- RT Interview: Morgan Spurlock on the Personal, the Political and Osama bin Laden 2
- RT Interview: Jon Favreau on Iron Man, Effective CGI and the New Marvel Movies 14
- RT interview: Roger Deakins on No Country for Old Men 16
- RT Interview: Charlie Wilson 8
- RT Interview: Colm Meaney on Three and Out, Life on Mars and life after Trek 2
- Jackie Chan Picks His Five Favorite Movies -- And Only One of Them Stars Jackie Chan 16
- RT Interview: Director Baillie Walsh on Ziggy, Roxy and Daniel Craig in Flashbacks of a Fool 1
- RT Interview: Milo Ventimiglia Gets Dark in Pathology, Talks Role In Neveldine & Taylor's Game 7
- RT Interview: Daniel Craig on Bond, Growing Up and Fading Out in Hollywood 6
Latest Features
- Steven Spielberg's Ten Best-Directed Films 90
- George Lucas - A Super-Producer's History 43
- Uwe Boll's Five Favorite Films 83
- Indiana Jonesin': The Best of Harrison Ford 31
- Peter Segal Talks About His Five Fave Films 36
- New Line Cinema: A Retrospective 36
- Neil Marshall's 10 Post-Apocalyptic Picks 18
- Ole! Tour Mexico Through the Movies! 21
- The Ghost Stays in the Picture 6
- Exclusive: RT Visits the Set of An Education 0



