Thanks to a career-defining role on a television show about superheroes, Milo Ventimiglia has become a household name. But fans of his wholesome roles as Peter Petrelli on Heroes (and before that, as Rory's true love, Jess Mariano, on Gilmore Girls), had better steel themselves for Ventimiglia's latest character: a competitive, exacting medical student seduced into a game of sex, drugs and murder in Pathology.
Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor (Crank) wrote and produced Pathology, a dark thriller packed with slabs of dead bodies and plenty of medical gore -- but most importantly, filled with lots of Milo. It's the first starring grown-up role for the 30-year-old actor, but it won't be his last; he's already filmed an appearance in Neveldine and Taylor's next directorial project, the futuristic MMO-based thriller, Game. Think a character named Rick Rape sounds brutal? Check out Ventimiglia's twisted star turn in Pathology, where he goes head-to-head (and scalpel-to-scalpel) with fellow murderous docs Michael Weston (The Last Kiss), Lauren Lee Smith (The L Word), and Johnny Whitworth (Empire Records).
In Pathology you play Ted Grey, a medical student sucked into a deadly game...
Milo Ventimiglia: He's a forensic pathologist who's kind of at the top of his game, who finds himself in a world that he's not in control of.
Is this the darkest character you've played so far in your career?
MV: I think [I've] never quite played a character like this before, a guy who is involved in the sorts of things he's involved in, but I also play a pretty sick fucker in Nevaldine and Taylor's next movie, Game.
I was reading about that! I think that's going to be really exciting for your fans. I mean, your character's name is...
MV: Rick Rape! Yeah, I know -- he's not a likable guy. Can I describe Rick Rape? Moonraker, silver grill, with a latex outfit making him look like a bumblebee. [Laughs.] With I think the perverse nature of...a teenage boy on speed.
And is he a killer-type of character?
MV: Rick Rape? No, he's not a killer. He's just...not quite himself.
Neveldine and Taylor obviously wrote Crank, then Pathology, and now have enlisted both you and your fellow Pathology star Johnny Whitworth for roles in Game. Did you just meet them and immediately want to be involved in any crazy projects that they were doing?
MV: I think it was mutual. Mark and Brian are a very specific lot of guys. They had [wanted] to throw me into the things they were working in just as much as I wanted to be in their graces. I was a big fan of Crank-- of the movie and of the script. And when Pathology came around I thought it was just a clever, intelligent take on a story that anybody else could have just fucked up. I think I got very lucky in those guys saying hey, now that we know you, you're going to be in everything we're involved in -- whether it's one line, no lines, or a major role. Those guys, they pretty much know that whatever they're asking me to do, I'm in. They didn't even tell me I had an option or a choice in Game, they just said "You're playing Rick Rape, and that's what you're gonna play." And I said, "Ok."
What is it about them that they bring to a movie that makes you want to be in it, no questions asked?
MV: They're innovators. I think they really are onto something that's ahead of their time right now in filmmaking, from the technology that they use, to the classic, practical side of making movies, to their drive when they're making movies -- they're involved, hands on the whole way through. Even as writers and producers on Pathology, those guys were there every day, through every conversation and every shot. I think they're going to be the next big thing. Back in the 1990s, you heard a lot about Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino, these guys who were up and coming for their Wild West attitudes and doing what they wanted -- that's Mark and Brian. But I don't want to compare them -- I mean, I think they're going to have the same kind of entrance as those guys did. Where people are like, "Holy f***, who are these guys? We have to work with them!" And if you look at their resume, or their IMDB profile, those guys are booked solid for the next year and a half.

Let's go back to Pathology. Your character is kind of unlike most protagonists, because his own morals are in question.
MV: Oh, absolutely. He's not a likeable guy; he's kind of the antihero. He's doing some really, really distasteful, dishonest, criminal things, but at the end of the film you're actually rooting for him to win. That was a hard line that we had to pay attention to -- making him in any way appealing to the audience. Because if the audience is not with him, if they're not sympathetic, if they don't want him to succeed at the end, it's going to be a waste of two hours for anybody watching. And that was always something, before filming, while we were filming, and after the fact, I always had conversations on to make it real and make him something that people were kind of salivating for.
And for Ted to succeed -- which the audience does want by the end -- means not for him to redeem himself, but to go deeper into that darkness.
MV: Yes, exactly.
Do you think the audience becomes implicated in that, because we want dark things to happen?
MV: I think people do want to see the ultimate ending that happens. I don't want to blow the ending, but I do think people want to see that.
Well, as one of the world's most squeamish movie watchers, I found Pathology to be excruciating to watch -- scalpels, bodies, autopsies, and those giant hedge cutters that cut into chest cavities...
MV: Yeah! That's what they really use; they use hedge cutters in the coroner's office. I think they are the fastest thing to get through bone. And the sound? The sound that they make in the movie, oh yeah. That's what it sounds like when you're crunching open a sternum.
![]() on Apr 17 2008 08:33 PM Holy crap its PETER PETRELLI! and ROCKY'S son! (Reply to this) |
|
on Apr 18 2008 10:49 AM OK, this has nothing whatsoever to do with this article, but I'm posting this open letter to the RT Staff because something feels really fishy about this whole News system now. I was thinking about it last night and wondered 'how can jeff giles go from the most featured writer on the site to doing very little writing at all, basically over night?' all RT staffers ever said was 'jeff will still be contributing" or something. answer this: did Jeff Giles get fired or demoted or whats the actual deal, because i find it really hard to believe that all of a sudden the entire News section changes and he's no longer featured much. I do recall an article not long ago regarding the new oliver stone movie 'W' in which jeff made some slightly leftist remarks and then had to spend the rest of the thread defending himself (with some help from loyal RT readers). Now it could well be a stretch to think that this had something to do with Jeff not being allowed to do his daily stories, but at this point I'm looking for SOME explanation. And I think we deserve more of an explanation then 'well we're trying some new stuff out and are continuously updating the site to make as good as possible for all of you.' whatever, that doesn't cut it. Can you RT staffers see how much you've changed the core of the site? No one is commenting on the stupid external link stories and all that remains as far as RT material is an occasional story but mostly features like interviews, critical consensus, total recall, meet a critic, etc. etc. The features are fine, but the story threads were where people really got into the discussions. We had a strong core community of regular posters and now it just doesn't feel the same. so RT, I really need you to explain why you've altered not only the aesthetic, but the entire dynamic of the site. It's less personal and frankly, less interesting. This is my go-to site and so i really am curious as why a lot of the fun has been sucked out of it in favor of redirecting us to outside pages. What happened to Jeff and what are the chances that things will return to the good ole days of putting an RT spin on a specific story, making it humorous and palatable and letting us all sling mud over it? thanks for your time. -Dahluzz (Reply to this) |
![]() on Apr 18 2008 02:25 PM Hi Dahluzz, Thanks for the post - even if it's an off-topic comment on my poor little Milo Ventimiglia article. Not to be dismissive of this or any of your previous posts on the matter, but the News Ticker we just implemented is being worked on, and everyone's comments heard. I'll try to let you know more when I get an update myself. Jeff Giles is still around, scouring the web for news and adding stories to the ticker every day. I also liked the "RT spin" on news stories and am glad that you miss it. If only more readers missed the old ways (i.e. old RT news was more popular), perhaps we wouldn't have had to change things... Jeff, Tim, Alex, Sara, and myself are still writing original pieces for RT - but you're right, most of that is interviews, features, and columns (did you see this week's Total Recall??). You will see Jeff's very witty thumbprint on our upcoming Summer Movie Guide in a few weeks. Since you're very supporting of the old RT news system, here's a question for you: would you rather see only maybe 5 non-original news stories per day, written with an RT slant so you could comment on them, or get maybe 15-20 all-encompassing stories a day, posted as they break? We realize that the new ticker is not yet ideal (low comment rate, people leaving site through links), but I assure you it's being continually reconsidered. And thank you for your committed involvement in RT. (Reply to this) |
|
on Apr 18 2008 05:40 PM I like Milo, as he is by the far the best thing on Heroes. By how can anybody be a big fan of Crank and its script? I mean come on, the sex scene involving Amy Smart might have killed her career. (Reply to this) |
![]() on Apr 18 2008 08:11 PM In reply to this comment (#1693273) That scene was really funny though. (Reply to this) |
|
on Apr 23 2008 09:37 AM In reply to this comment (#1692940) Jen: "Since you're very supporting of the old RT news system, here's a question for you: would you rather see only maybe 5 non-original news stories per day, written with an RT slant so you could comment on them, or get maybe 15-20 all-encompassing stories a day, posted as they break?" Honestly Jen, I would much rather see 5 stories a day, selected from the fray by you guys as specific items we should focus in and comment on. I read the stories just as much for comments as i did the content. \ with the new system, you guys are valuing quantity over quality. it's not like you maintained the 5 RT-style stories and then supplemented them with 10 additional breaking stories from across the web (thus giving us more than you did before). No, you guys just ditched all the personality of the old ways in favor of dumping a bunch of stories on us that really have nothing to do with RT. don't try to tell me that Jeff's writing talents are better exercised by him searching the web for other people's work and then posting it on RT. Please, anybody with half a clue can do that. Yeah, the old ways DID require more effort, but that's what made people care enough to comment. now we can't even rally around a subject long enough to have a forum discussion before another article or two is thrown into the mix. there's much less selectivity on the parts of the Editors now and the site's less interactive and less fun. Please accept that this 'improved' news feature is actually a step backwards and reinstate the classic way of delivering us our daily stories. (Reply to this) |
![]() on Apr 29 2008 11:37 AM Dahluzz, Again, I appreciate you taking the time to comment. I'll bring up your points with the rest of RT editorial. Jen (Reply to this) |
- Five Favorite Films with Paris Hilton 128
- The Net Reacts to 25 Minutes of Watchmen Footage 50
- Weekly Ketchup: Branagh directs Thor, Seagal vs. aliens? 45
- Critics Consensus: Chihuahua a Dog; Nick and Norah a Hot Item 43
- Box Office Guru Wrapup: Chihuahua is Top Dog 40
- RT on DVD: The Future of Watchmen, Plus Sleeping Beauty, Touch of Evil Remastered 24
- Total Recall: The 15 Greatest Paul Newman Movies 23
- Box Office Guru Preview: Chihuahua to Overtake Multiplexes 18
- Exclusive: The Fall - Tarsem's Visual Companion - Part 1 12
- Further Reading: Marion Cotillard and Forest Whittaker in Abel Ferrara's Mary 3
- RT on DVD: The Future of Watchmen, Plus Sleeping Beauty, Touch of Evil Remastered 24
- Exclusive: The Fall - Tarsem's Visual Companion - Part 2 3
- Box Office Guru Wrapup: Chihuahua is Top Dog 40
- Weekly Ketchup: Branagh directs Thor, Seagal vs. aliens? 45
- Exclusive: The Fall - Tarsem's Visual Companion - Part 1 12
- UK Critics Consensus: How To Lose Friends & Alienate People Does Just That; Whilst Brideshead Revisited Is Resisted 1
- Further Reading: Marion Cotillard and Forest Whittaker in Abel Ferrara's Mary 3
- Critics Consensus: Chihuahua a Dog; Nick and Norah a Hot Item 43
- Box Office Guru Preview: Chihuahua to Overtake Multiplexes 18
- The Net Reacts to 25 Minutes of Watchmen Footage 50
- RT Interview: Jason Statham Chats Death Race, Crank 2 and The Sweeney 9
- Video Exclusive: Gerard Butler talks RocknRolla and 300 sequel with RT 13
- Video Exclusive: Maria Bello, Brendan Fraser and the Mummy 3 Cast Talk to RT 14
- RT goes behind the scenes on Stargate: Continuum 4
- Starship Troopers' Casper Van Dien Shares His Five Favorite Films 48
- RT Interview: Philippe Petit on Crossing the Twin Towers on a Wire 2
- RT Interview: David Duchovny on The X-Files, Californication and Directing 11
- RT Interview: Ben Barnes on Taking on the Journey of Prince Caspian 1
- RT Interview: William Moseley on His Last Narnia Adventure in Prince Caspian 2
- RT Interview: Jack Black on Kung Fu Panda 6
- Exclusive: The Fall - Tarsem's Visual Companion - Part 2 3
- Exclusive: The Fall - Tarsem's Visual Companion - Part 1 12
- Five Favorite Films with Paris Hilton 128
- Exclusive: Brand New The Children Photos and Director Introduction 5
- Five Favorite Films with Chuck Palahniuk 38
- Five Favorite Films with Dane Cook 103
- Five Favorite Films with Eva Mendes 51
- What The Hell Happened To ... Cuba Gooding Jr.? 86
- RT's Summer in Review: The Best, The Worst, and Our Favorite Films! 77
- What The Hell Happened To Shannon Elizabeth? 101



