IGN.com|AskMen.com|Rotten Tomatoes|GameSpy|FilePlanet|TeamXbox|CheatsCodesGuides|GameStats|Direct2Drive

RottenTomatoes.com

Register | Log In | What is RT?
It's our 10th birthday, so you get presents!
Home Movies DVD Celebrities News Critics Photos & Trailers The Vine Forums
Features | Columns | Guides
RT Search Powered by Google
 
RT News / interview
RT Interview: Jon Favreau on Iron Man, Effective CGI and the New Marvel Movies
The helmer on how to deliver the ultimate fanboy superhero movie.
by Joe Utichi | April 28, 2008
Blog Article | Discuss Article
Jon Favreau - M. Caulfield/WireImage.comActor, director, fanboy hero. When Jon Favreau was announced as the man who'd be responsible for bringing one of Marvel's comic staples to the big screen it was news openly embraced by a passionate group of fans. With Robert Downey Jr. later cast in the lead role, interest in Iron Man reached fever pitch. For two years Favreau has consulted with those fans and dropped teasers of his adaptation to the point that, come Friday, a legion of dorks will be openly salivating in anticipation outside cinemas worldwide. And lest it seem like we're disapproving of that sort of thing - rest assured RT will be there too.

But, as we sit down with an exhausted Favreau, who's fighting his way around the world on a mammoth press trip for the movie, the multihyphenate explains that it's everyone else he wants to see in cinemas. Favreau tells us why Iron Man needs to fly into the hearts of housewives, dads and kids if he's going to be given the reins to another chapter...

Busy day?

Jon Favreau: Busy two weeks. I started in LA, went to Mexico City, Australia, Seoul, Paris, Berlin, Rome and now London and then I'm going to New York for more press and finally back to LA for the premiere.

Is this the biggest thing you've ever experienced?

JF: By far. And I'm afraid to fly! Well, I was...

For Robert and me, this is a huge opportunity for both of us and we've got to really get out there. Especially this summer where there are so many good movies coming out. You've got to do everything you can to stand out, whether it's marketing tie-ins or personal appearances or press or talk shows or cutting commercials together; anything you can to cut through all that chatter and get to the audience you hope will come see the movie and make it successful.

Robert's even in The Incredible Hulk - it's that intense...

JF: He does, I think, a one scene cameo in the film. I don't know that much about it, I wasn't involved in that, but he's confirmed it so I feel comfortable talking about it!

But this is the first film under a new approach Marvel is taking to making movies that's really empowering that.

JF: Absolutely - it's their money. Marvel has tremendous control over these characters now. They're not sharing control with a studio like Sony or Fox which is the arrangement they'd had in the past. As certain characters revert back to them they're self-financing these projects, which gives them the ability to combine characters if they want to. You couldn't do that with X-Men or Spider-Man because they're different studios.

Iron Man


There was talk of a cameo by Samuel L. Jackson as Nick Fury in Iron Man but we didn't spot it in the movie - what happened to that?

JF: Well, we were making the movie for two years and a year ago we went to Comic-Con and showed a bit of footage, then some spy stuff or reports from the set come out, and then we leak certain footage and images. People are smart - especially the fans of Marvel comics. Many of them know more about the source material than I do. They're able to piece together what's going on and what you don't want to have happen is have everyone figure out what's in the movie before it comes out.

So I'm online, I'm reading Rotten Tomatoes, I'm reading Ain't it Cool News, I'm reading Dark Horizons, Superhero Hype, and I have my own MySpace Iron Man movie group. I'm constantly getting a sense about what people are talking about and what they're expecting and sometimes you have to acknowledge the anticipations and sometimes you have to go against them. You never want the audience to be ahead of you, because you always want some surprises up your sleeve.

It all comes down to this phrase that Robert even uses in the press notes: nerdgasm. All of that anticipation is the build up to the nerdgasm, which is the release of the film. But you even go as far as doing it in the film, with Terrence Howard's line, "Next time baby," when he looks at the empty suit...

JF: Yeah, and there are a few of those. The way we introduce S.H.I.E.L.D. is another thing where you don't see it coming and then it's there. There's all sorts of images and references to The Mandarin, in the end credits in the animations there's a little tip of the hat to War Machine. There's little things in the details that I know the fans of the books are going to see. They fly by people that aren't aware of the books and they can see the movie as what it is, a summer popcorn movie with hopefully and intelligent tone to it, and ultimately a story about a man who transforms himself.

Iron Man


There's also a much greater sense of reality to the film than we're used to from superhero movies, you built a lot of what we see on screen and you use CGI sparingly.

JF: Me and my effects supervisor John Nelson worked with the Stan Winston studios to build practical suits and we were working with the team from ILM who, a lot of them, had worked on Transformers. We got to benefit from a lot of the technology they broke through for that production which really makes Iron Man photo-real. As you might know, I'm not a fan of CGI per-se so I was very demanding that we make the effects as photo-real as possible.

If you can find a balance where you're using that technology where necessary but practical effects where you can the blend is much more seamless and it's harder to tell where the CG comes in.

JF: Well that's what Jurassic Park did and that's why I think it holds up so well today. There are relatively few shots in Jurassic Park; a lot of that stuff is robotics, animatronics. You have to mix practical with computer generated and so there was stuff we did that was seen as wasteful sometimes when we were budgeting.

When Iron Man's flying we'd send real planes up to do the choreography so that we'd get the camerawork to really look like a cameraman was following from another plane. It gives it that Top Gun look. One of the first things I did was I sat down all the people working on the visual effects and we screened scenes from Top Gun and scenes from Stealth and I said, "Why does Top Gun look so much more real?" Stealth had all of this money, technology and state-of-the-art effects and it looks like you're watching a videogame.

We figured out that a lot of it had to do with how restrained the camera was. Don't give the camera too much freedom or choreography. Get the shading right, the lighting right and there are things you can do to make the CGI look more real. People end up going crazy and give themselves a little too much freedom in how they use CGI and if you overuse it, it draws attention to itself.

Iron Man


Does your Iron Man journey continue? Are you going to stick around?

JF: I hope so. Now it's out of the hands of us, of the filmmakers, and it's even out the hands of your readers. I know all the people who have been following this for two years are going to go and see the movie, and maybe they'll see it twice and I'm very grateful for that, but it's got to crossover and it's got to hit people who've never heard of Iron Man. It's got to hit the housewives, it's got to hit the dads, it's got to hit the kids and if everybody comes out to see the movie and it's successful, then I'm sure Marvel's going to want to do another one and if they want to, I've got another two movies in my head and I'm ready to go and I know the cast feels the same way. It's really in the hands of the public now, whether they like it or not.

But I'm very proud of what we were able to accomplish and I'm very grateful to your readership and the people who were very supportive of this when it was seen by the mainstream media as a B-level superhero movie that would be an experiment in financing as to whether Wall Street would support Marvel in their new studio and now the debate is about what's going to be the biggest movie of the summer and whether Iron Man will be one of them. Things really got classed-up and I owe a debt of gratitude to the fanboys who really stuck with it and were vocal about it and their voices really rose up to the mainstream.

Related Items
Movie: X-Men
The Incredible Hulk
Top Gun
Transformers
Stealth
Jurassic Park
Spider-Man
Celeb: Terrence Howard
Robert Downey Jr.
Jon Favreau
Stan Winston
Samuel L. Jackson
John Nelson
Bookmark and Share
Comments (1-15 of 15 posts) | Reply
bat-fink writes:
on Apr 28 2008 06:33 AM

From the trailers of this movie, I wan Favrou to direct every superhero movie ever to come out of hollywood! This film shows both great vision, great scripting and maximum respect for the source material! Well, from the trailers anyway. And hope to god we see some war-machine action in the sequel.

Hope he directs captain america too, that i would like to see.

Maybe if he gets a bit of free time, he might even remake Judge Dredd for me? wishfull thinking.

Keep up the good work Favrou, looking forward to Iron-man. Maybe a cameo of spidey in the background would be neat in the sequel?


(Reply to this)
425356
TombstoneLawDog writes:
on Apr 28 2008 09:04 AM

Like I've said before and I'll keep saying- THIS ALL LOOKS GOOD *BUT* lemme see the movie. I've liked Favreau since 'Swingers' but that doesn't mean he can direct (didn't like Elf, didn't see Zathura). I WANT this to be good so I can completely believe in him. MAKE ME BELIEVE!

(Reply to this)
DaHypr1 writes:
on Apr 28 2008 09:07 AM

yeah I agree, bat-fink. Favreau is very dedicated in everything he dopes, and I'm glad that he decided to do this. I really like the idea of blending real with cgi so you can't tell which is which, just like he said Jurassic Park did. This guy is awesome! oh and the movie looks awesome too haha

(Reply to this)
DaHypr1 writes:
on Apr 28 2008 12:12 PM

In reply to this comment (#1708433)
*does. i dont think hes a drug dealer haha

(Reply to this)
466901
kooks25 writes:
on Apr 28 2008 06:33 PM

This. Movie. Looks. Awesome.

(Reply to this)
Bruce Campbell writes:
on Apr 28 2008 07:27 PM

Elf... Zathura... Iron Man.

This man is god.


(Reply to this)
375906
martinscorsese25 writes:
on Apr 28 2008 07:33 PM

there should be a SPOILER WARNING posted!!!! they gave a little about the movie!!!

and also!! does stan lee makes an appearance again for this???!!!! wow, if he does then he's certainly on his way on becoming an actor!!! maybe he'll win an oscar someday, Best Performance by an Actor in a Cameo!!! LOL


(Reply to this)
196903
CenoBiteMe2000 writes:
on Apr 28 2008 10:21 PM

I don't like the Iron Monger design (too bulky), but I'm looking forward to finally seeing Old Shellhead on the big screen.

(Reply to this)
445284
dahluzz writes:
on Apr 29 2008 07:26 AM

if the unconventional choice in director works, you'll see kevin smith getting paid a butt-load to finally make his superhero movie (whatever it may be. he was gonna do 'green hornet' but didn't and now seth rogen's writing it. although they did 'zack and miri' recently, so who knows, maybe they'll collab.)

But I think whether or not the film is all it's cracked up to be, Favreau has treated the source material and fans with the utmost respect and you can't say that about a lot of directors who just get wrapped up in their "vision."

and going in, favreau seemed pretty committed to doing iron man justice. he was initially selected for 'captain america' but declined in favor of doing this. but i guess when you think about it, Cap is the tougher movie to make cool. its a period piece instead of contemporary, iron man has a way sweeter costume and abilities and steve rogers is just kind of square compared to tony stark.

it'll be interesting to see how nick cassavetes, 'iron man's' original director who was flip-flopped over to 'captain america' will handle some of those issues. 'alpha dog' and 'john q' were solid, but 'the notebook'? i guess marvel feels like rolling the dice a bit.

but hey, i'd rather that than various studios owning the comic properties and preventing character cross-overs like we're starting to see now with iron man in the new 'hulk'. this would potentially allow for an Avengers movie with the original actors in tact, unlike the abysmal prospect of a JLA movie from scratch.

so props to jon and here's hoping the movie delivers, if not for two sequals, than for the further informed risks it'll allow marvel to take with its properties.


(Reply to this)
494987
Runtun writes:
on May 01 2008 09:07 PM

His attitude in regards to special effects is spot on. One thing that I was really impressed with about Iron Man was the use of special effects.

(Reply to this)
lauriemann writes:
on May 02 2008 05:36 PM

My husband and I saw the movie this afternoon and it was one of the best comics-based movie we've ever seen. The quick cameo of Stan Lee was a complete hoot. Great integration of effects, too. And, yes, sticking around to the end of the credits was very much worthwhile (even if the director ahem, "borrowed" the setting of that particular scene from another movie).

One of the only screw-ups in the whole movie was making Afghanistan seem to be adjacent to Edwards Air Force Base. Otherwise, the movie flowed well, and I couldn't find many things to complain about. Nice touches, like having two of the leads wear the distinctive MIT ring and SHIELD showing up early (but not often - I caught that one right away).

The one minor gotcha - there were almost no women in the audience. Yeah, we know the guys are going to dominate an audience for a movie based on a comic. Still, the Spiderman, X-Men and Batman audiences all had a higher percentage of women. Could be a first-afternoon phenomenon.


(Reply to this)
lauriemann writes:
on May 02 2008 05:38 PM

My husband and I saw the movie this afternoon and it was one of the best comics-based movie we've ever seen. The quick cameo of Stan Lee was a complete hoot. Great integration of effects, too. And, yes, sticking around to the end of the credits was very much worthwhile (even if the director ahem, "borrowed" the setting of that particular scene from another movie).

One of the only screw-ups in the whole movie was making Afghanistan seem to be adjacent to Edwards Air Force Base. Otherwise, the movie flowed well, and I couldn't find many things to complain about. Nice touches, like having two of the leads wear the distinctive MIT ring and SHIELD showing up early (but not often - I caught that one right away).

The one minor gotcha - there were almost no women in the audience. Yeah, we know the guys are going to dominate an audience for a movie based on a comic. Still, the Spiderman, X-Men and Batman audiences all had a higher percentage of women. Could be a first-afternoon phenomenon.


(Reply to this)
528515
dpramroop writes:
on May 02 2008 08:49 PM

well we all know spiderman cant top iron man now.

(Reply to this)
528515
dpramroop writes:
on May 02 2008 08:49 PM

well we all know spiderman cant top iron man now.

(Reply to this)
302200
Graehaus writes:
on May 23 2008 04:36 AM

Love Iron man, that is what the comics right now should be going, none of this civil war crap or secret invasion.
With Spider man not out doing Iron man, I gotta disagree Spidey 2 was amazing.


(Reply to this)
Read More Comments
Page | 1
Post Your Comment
You must be registered to post comments. Login or Register.
Related Links
Iron Man
  • Posters
  • News
  • Forum
Related Articles
  • The Beginning of the End for the Superhero Craze? 31
  • Iron Man Hitting Shelves September 30th 6
  • Some Early Lessons from the Summer of '08 2
  • Paramount Breaks Billion-Dollar Box Office 3
  • Total Recall: The Best of Stan Winston 14
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Hulk 2.0 Battles Shyamalan 8.0 10
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Black vs. Sandler in Comedy Showdown 20
  • Movie Ads Raise Ire of FTC, Parent Watchdog Groups 2
  • UK Box Office Breakdown: Carrie Beats Indy 4
  • Iron Man Duo Writing Adaptation of Ludlum's Sigma Protocol 2
Most Discussed
  • Holy Box-Office, Batman! Dark Knight Makes $66M On Record-Breaking Opening Day 147
  • Box Office Guru Wrapup: Kapow! The Bat Slams The Box Office 75
  • XXX3 to Revive Vin Diesel 26
  • Watching the Watchmen Trailer: A Detailed Analysis 26
  • High-Res Images: Rose McGowan as Red Sonja 22
  • Transformers 2 Scribe Sets Record Straight 21
  • RT Photo Preview: What To Watch at Comic-Con 20
  • Further Reading: Dark Knight is Unforgettable, but Who Remembers James Batman? 18
  • Hugh Jackman Premieres Wolverine Footage at Comic-Con 17
  • Clone Wars Series Details Revealed 16
Latest News
  • Review Revue: Step Brothers Take on The X-Files 1
  • High-Res Images: Rose McGowan as Red Sonja 22
  • Twilight Fans Storm Comic-Con, Rewarded With Extended Vampire Fight Scene 8
  • Watching the Watchmen Trailer: A Detailed Analysis 26
  • Critics Consensus: File The X-Files Under "Disappointing" 12
  • Hugh Jackman Premieres Wolverine Footage at Comic-Con 17
  • Box Office Guru Preview: Step Brothers and X-Files Hope For the Best 4
  • RT Photo Preview: What To Watch at Comic-Con 20
  • Party with the Masters of the Web at Comic-Con! 1
  • Further Reading: Dark Knight is Unforgettable, but Who Remembers James Batman? 18
Latest Interviews
  • RT Interview: Ben Barnes on Taking on the Journey of Prince Caspian 0
  • RT Interview: William Moseley on His Last Narnia Adventure in Prince Caspian 2
  • RT Interview: Jack Black on Kung Fu Panda 6
  • RT Interview: Skandar Keynes on the Action Challenge of Prince Caspian 1
  • RT Interview: Anna Popplewell on a Different Side to Narnia in Prince Caspian 10
  • RT Interview: Keira Knightley on Welsh Accents and Life After Pirates 15
  • RT Interview: Sienna Miller on Dylan Thomas, G.I. Joe and Nottingham 2
  • RT Interview: Ben Affleck Goes After the Critics for a Change 34
  • Interview: Uwe Boll Talks Postal, Kevin Costner, and Answers Reader Mail 43
  • RT Interview: Joan Cusack on War, Inc., the Unofficial Sequel to Grosse Point Blank 6
Latest Features
  • Watching the Watchmen Trailer: A Detailed Analysis 26
  • Exclusive: Ben Burtt's WALL-E Sound Masterclass 1
  • Exclusive: The Storyboards of WALL-E 6
  • Exclusive: The World of WALL-E 10
  • Exclusive: Inside Pixar - A Photo Tour 14
  • Exclusive: Pixar's and Stars' Favourite WALL-E Moments 23
  • Guillermo del Toro - RT's Dinner and the Movies Interview 28
  • Edinburgh 2008: What to Watch 6
  • Total Recall: The 25 Best Action Heroines of All Time 125
  • Exclusive: Hellboy II Edit Suite Visit and Concept Art 7


About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Celebs List| Newsletter

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | ModCenter | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive


By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.
Copyright 1998-2008, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | Subscribe to RT's XML feed! IGN RSS Feeds
IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA
Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.