Blog Snapshot
Blog Entries
Showing 1 - 7 of 7 Blog Entries
|
God, I haven't posted in this thing for ages.
Since I wrote last a lot of things happened to me. I'm not really that irreverent lark whose ramblings one may find below. I've read Burroughs and Pynchon and a few others in between. I'm no longer a total aesthete and I no longer measure a film's quality based around its splatter factor. I'm now interested in the sublime and seek it out when I hear whispers of its presence. There was a love, also, that didn't pan out like it should've and its aftershocks linger still. Also, this is my space: http://www.myspace.com/ohdaesugotacuriousgrin Also, I think the greatest TV show of all time is/was DEADWOOD and that it's a fucking atrocity against humanity that it got canned. Shakespeare never got cancelled=fact. |
|
0 Comments | |
|
|
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the new Hills Have Eyes is a lot better than the old Hills Have Eyes. It's better directed, written, and acted, and it's also a lot scarier, and a helluva lot gorier. I say this now because I've now seen the original, and, frankly, it kinda sucks. I appreciate old Wes Craven's spare directing style, but the acting is horrendous, and the only good parts about it are the all-to-brief trailer sequence and Michael Berryman's face. Aside from that, it's boring as all hell. It's not as good as Last House on the Left, although there are no moments in it that are as glaringly bad as the bad parts of LHOTL (which is everything that does not take place in the woods). It's depressingly mediocre. The new one, by Alexandre Aja, one of the best horror filmmakers today, or maybe ever depending on where he goes from THHE and High Tension. (if he stops being good from there, at least he has two pretty excellent horror flicks under his belt, and can go the way of Lucio Fulci and Argento before him and peter out after a couple years of brilliance)
Lady Vengeance is really, really good. I think the last scene is a little too quirky and odd, and it is not my favorite of Park Chanwook's vengeance trilogy on account of Oldboy being the greatest movie ever made and all. To be fair, there are probably better movies than Oldboy that don't make you feel like you've just been raped, it's just that I don't know what they are called. Anyway, Lady Vengeance is really, really good. It's certainly more fun than Sympathy for Mr.Vengeance, which is the most depressing movie I've ever seen and really slow to boot. Lady is slow, but not too slow. What's great about it is that half of it is a wonderfully hilarious black comedy/satire and the other half is a thought-provoker of a drama about revenge and justice and whatnot. At some point a puppy gets shot in the face, too, I'm not sure how that fits in. Also a man-dog-thing gets shot in the face. Did I mention that a few parts of this are really fuckin' odd? A bit like the ant part in Oldboy, only even more whimsical. Yes, this is a whimsical sort of movie for all the bloodshed and puppies being shot in the face. I guess parts of all of Park's movies are kinda whimsical, but this is definitely the most whimsical-y of all of them. With the exception of the last scene, the only kinda crappy part is that the parts in English aren't well acted, but that's kind of par for the course in Asian cinema--there's also a rather ill-advised song sung by the little girl that probably sounded a lot better to people who don't speak English. There is actually a lot more singing in this movie than in the other Park Chanwook movies, but the only one that is kinda crappy is the English one in one scene, but it's also not a musical so don't go expecting it to have lots of singing about rain and sounds of music and Chicago and rent and lots of other shit that people tend to sing about in musicals but also shit that nobody really cares about. Instead, this is a movie where puppies and man-dogs get shot in the face. Take that for what it's worth. In speaking of whimsical, I had the wonderful fortune of viewing most of what might not be the worst movie ever made, but certainly the worst acted movie I've ever seen. It's called The Adventures of Young Van Helsing: The Quest for the Lost Scepter, and the fact that it takes 12 words just to make a title that fits the movie is undoubtedly indicative of the quality. The back of the box says that it's about Van Helsing, or one of Van Helsing's descendants, who's in high school and is aided by a "whimsical" professor in his battles against some evil guy. In the annals of Phd-equipped whimsicalists, there has never been a more whimsical professor than this guy in this movie. He's so whimsical, there's one part where he literally moves in and out of his own closeup because the camera just couldn't hold all of his whimsicalness in one mere closeup. The movie's audience is very hard to pin down. It seems to be for teens, but no teen would be dead watching this piece of crap, and it's also loaded with violence and terrible gore effects. The acting from pretty much everyone is glorious in ways that only the most avowed thespo-masochists will be able to truly appreciate. There is also some absolutely hilarious racial stereotyping--an already unintentionally knee-slappingly executed scene where the bad guy attacks the car of a black couple is made even worse by their ridiculous dialogue, proving the film was officially written by the whitest retarded person on Earth. "DAAAAYUM!" indeed. So basically it's like Plan 9 From Outer Space, but minus Criswell and the addition of Young Van Helsing's awful band occasionally showing up and playing a few entire songs to drag it out to feature length--I gave up watching after the bad guy was defeated and Van Helsing's band was playing at the Valentine's Day Dance, because the earlier musical sequence told me everything I needed to know about his musical talents (it's also obvious that they aren't actually playing, as they just strum one chord over and over again). There are so many hilariously bad elements of it that I can't help but recommend it to fans of Ed Wood or Uwe Boll. It's worse than House of the Dead and Alone in the Dark combined. Oh, the Wal-Mart $5 bin is full of suprises. |
|
0 Comments | |
|
|
Okay, so this is what I've been watching, all zero of you that care:
I saw United 93, and that was fantastic, but I can't really say much more about it. I want to see a crazy conspiracy 9/11 movie right now, but the best I could do would be Loose Change on the internets, and that looks a little shitty. Then I saw Ghost Dog: Way of the Samurai, which just might have knocked either Broken Flowers or Dead Man off the top spot in my "Favorite Jarmusches" (Jarmuschi?) list, consisting of the four that I've seen. Great badass cinema. Then I got bored with Netflix so I went to Hollywood Video and rented Hostel, Layer Cake, Marebito, R-Point and Gummo. Hostel I've seen already, but it really is too good for me just to see two times, and Eli Roth DVDs rock. Most of the criticism of the film is either shallow or misguided. For "shallow", see pretty much everyone on IMDB. For "misguided", see Walter Chaw's pan over at Film Freak Central. I probably would have directed it differently at times, and the current ending is a bit too easy. But Roth is getting to be sooo good. Once the shit hits the fan, you'd think that if a younger Spielberg lost any sense of decency and made a kickass horror movie, he'd have made the last 40 minutes of Hostel. Excellent, sick entertainment. Layer Cake I've also seen before, but I only picked up on half the plot the first time on account of the movie being the most awesomely convoluted movie ever. Matthew Vaughn is better than Guy Ritchie, and unless Matthew Vaughn decides to marry Madonna any time soon, he's one to watch. Daniel Craig is also going to be a fascinating Bond. A Blond Bond. Marebito is this Takashi Shimizu quickie shot during the week before he shot The Grudge (the Hollywood one, which I'll admit I saw before Ju-on and I prefer slightly over Ju-on) with the Tetsuo guy in the lead, who is, in general, the man. The first fifteen minutes or so are a bit great, but then it gets a little too deep into its own nonsense, and while the greatness returns a few times, it's mostly downhill from there. Shimizu is a bit more energetic a director than, say, Miike at times, but Shimizu is almost a hack. Almost. Shimizu is more marketable, but most of his ideas are just typical J-horror, though I did appreciate Marebito's ideas and visuals at times. R-Point's first 90 minutes are pretty well made for a Korean-made Vietnam war/supernatural thriller, but I won't deny that it bored me. The last 20 minutes, though, are something special. It becomes very stylish, very dramatic, and it all comes together nicely. It probably could have lost a chunk from the first 90 minutes, but I'm rarely one to complain about length. Gummo is really quite wonderful. At times it's amateurish, but it seems intentional, and the amateurishness is really no different than what you'd find in your average documentary. Parts are sick, twisted, and uncomfortable, but there's something endearing about the whole thing. If it's an exercise in shock value, it's at least warm and humane about it. And then, at the cinema I saw Art School Confidential. Now, I haven't seen Ghost World, unfortunately, but this Terry Zwigoff seems to hate everything. It's great to see. Art School Confidential isn't as good as Bad Santa, but it does mutate weirdly into a serial killer picture, and I tend to like that. (For instance, I wasn't expecting Match Point to have murders in it, and I was pleasantly surprised) Parts are pretty funny, and the cynicism is pleasantly overpowering. It wasn't great, but it was interesting and funny. After that, I finally caught Lucky Number Slevin, and I found it was the sort of picture I tend to like. It was recommended to me by my gay friend, who works in a video store yet barely knows anything about movies. Anyway, so it was fun times, I loved the twisting and turning, the way the comic tone contrasted with the graphic violence, some of the dialogue, which was excellent if a bit too cute. I did find it to be a little too lightweight, but any movie with The Morgan Freeman V.S. Sir Ben Kingsley that is not directed by Uwe Boll has my recommendation. Now, I'm just waiting on Lady Vengeance. This Friday cannot come sooner. |
|
0 Comments | |
|
|
The crushing disappointment over Silent Hill (and to a much greater extent, the mind-numbing, juvenile criticism of it) has subsided, and all I'm left with is an urge to check it out again just to make sure that I like it. Honestly...25%? Are you serious, critics? I mean, are you fucking serious? It doesn't help matters that whoever has been posting reviews of it obviously wants to make it look bad, because it has a 0% cream of the crop, even though James Berardinelli, who tends to be on or at least in close proximity to the money, gave it two and a half out of four. They picked one of the sentences of his review that listed flaws, and then passed it off as what the whole review says. Even in that quote he says positive things about it. Sure, two and a half isn't great, but then Slant Magazine (who, aside from being kinda douchebaggy at points, seem to know what's what in your humble narrator's opinion) gives two and a half, and it's positive. Actually, Slant should be part of the cream of the crop, because they're good with the criticismizing, although their dislike of Chanwook Park is wrong-headed and annoying. Empire Mag's review of SH is also a three out of five, I believe, and although it's pretty hard to pull a good, truly positive quote from that review, the star rating seems to speak for itself.
Anyway, in speaking of Chanwook Park, Lady Vengeance opens near my burg on May 19, unless Tartan plans to screw DC over again on the Park-age like they did with Sympathy For Mr.Vengeance last summer--I had to wait months to see that shit on DVD, and it ruined my day in the best possible way. That's really the only movie on my radar right now, though I think I need to get out and see United 93, no matter how much I wish it was a crazy Oliver Stone conspiracy theory movie, because, Christ...it's 9/11. My only real fear about it is a thread on the imdb message board that goes kinda like "I saw the movie, and now I'm for the war in Iraq". Let's ignore the stupidity of that statement for a moment, and instead think back to when Passion of the Christ, another borderline unwatchable endurance test, almost scared me into being Christian. For a good 36 hours I was like "Hmm...". I really don't want my ideology challenged right about now, but for some reason I don't think United 93 is propaganda aimed at anyone, unlike the Thrashing of the Christ, which was probably aimed at Jews to convince them that suicide is the only way to go. However, I'm also worrying that it's actually bullshit and that it was shot down or perhaps aliens boarded the flight and fought the terrorists in a ring of fire that had decided to form itself in the upper left baggage compartment, a battle refereed by Chuck Norris and then the government tried to cover it up by putting bags on their heads and running around in circles shouting about noodles drenched in delicious cheese sauce as Saudis watched and laughed in evil glee, or whatever people are saying might have really happened on that plane. Also, I have a strong but fairly controllable urge to see Lucky Number Slevin, because it's been recommended to me personally, and apparently eight people get killed in the opening scene, which is enough to make me want to see that scene, regardless of how negative the review on it that said so was. (being the Washington Post, and curiously, being Stephen Hunter, who usually gets an old man chubby over blood festivals--actually, come to think of it, he's stopped being the almost be-all, almost end-all word on movies for me, after he panned V for Vendetta) So, yeah, that's all there is. |
|
0 Comments | |
|
I have no idea what to think about Silent Hill. On one hand, it gave me the fanboy shakes and I felt the need to join half the audience in applauding it just to drown out the dumbass shouting "boo!"
The problem with Silent Hill is that it's King Kong all over again, a good director masturbating to his material so much that the movie goes on much longer than it should and half an hour could have been lost without hurting the movie. It doesn't help matters much that the studio was fucking retarded. They made them tack on the whole Sean Bean subplot just so there would be some men. That Gans accepted just goes to show you how much he loves Silent Hill. He wants to explore every possible facet of the movie, and in doing so he loses most of his audience in the process. Don't get me wrong, Silent Hill is pretty good filmmaking, it's just not good storytelling. |
|
0 Comments | |
|
|
Okay, I think I'm going to complain about Sony Pictures now, because that's something I think I should get around to doing. They're apparently not too big a fan of screening movies for critics.
Now, I'm one of those people who thinks that maybe, just maybe, if people would start making, you know, BETTER MOVIES, the critics wouldn't be so negative all the time. But those people are crazy, say the studios. Instead, we just don't show our shitty movie to the critics. We'll probably let Wireless Magazine review it, though, because if Harvey Weinstein took a steaming dump on their lawn they'd say "FOUR STARS! HARVEY WEINSTEIN'S SHIT IS THRILLING, ENTHRALLING, AND ODOROUS!" The reason I bring this up is that Sony isn't screening Silent Fucking Hill for US critics until the 20th, the night before the movie opens. This is an absolute asinine douchebag decision, because, from my point of view, this looks like a kickass movie. It has women getting their flesh ripped off by men wearing large metal pyramid helmets. You can't say that about any run-of-the-mill flick like the American Dreamz, or the Sentinel, both of which open the same day. I'm not sure if releasing Silent Fucking Hill on this day was a very good decision, I know it's been set in stone for a while, but you're putting a horror flick with pretty much no-name actors (and Boromir) up against Michael Douglas and...Hugh Grant? Okay, so maybe Hugh Grant could get his ass handed to him by Silent Hill, but Michael Douglas's father is Kirk Douglas, who was in Spartacus and Paths of Glory, both of which were directed by The Kubrick, and when you're only three steps away from The Kubrick, all the pyramid-headed flesh-rippers in the world can't stop you. I hope this assertion is proven wrong, but it isn't screening for critics. I'm not too worried, because Sony didn't screen Hostel, and in case you didn't hear, that fucking OWNED. Not just rocked, but OWNED. I usually don't bust out with the hip-talk, but when a movie is naked European women for 45 minutes and then gory torture for another 40 minutes, it's a special occasion. God, I need that to come out on DVD. Wait, it is! But anyway, I'm saying that it gives intelligent viewers the wrong impression, and it might just turn off some critics based upon the fact that it wasn't screened. And intelligent viewers and critics would probably be the ones who would end up liking it. All the morons who came in just to see why the fuck the little girl has no mouth in the poster will leave the theater dumbfounded and slapping their foreheads with their stubby Down's Syndrome arms. (as all stupid moviegoers have in my world) Okay, so I haven't viddied any flicks for a few days, that is ones that I haven't seen before, or watched any all the way through. I'm thinking about watching Goodfellas again, but I've only watched that every Friday for the last month, and I need to cut back on that. Watching Goodfellas is like snorting movie cocaine. I'm addicted. |
|
0 Comments | |
|
God, I need to see Silent Hill. It's not just you, God, that I'm talking to, but also Jesus. Seriously, guys, what gives? Why haven't I seen Silent Hill yet? Why did you have to organize time so that a day feels like 24 hours and 11 days feels like 264 hours? I am in desperate need of the goodness that may result from this game-to-film concoction. I mean, it has this French guy directing it, and the French, say what you will about their affinity for being pussies and burning cars, know how to fucking direct movies. It has Roger Avary writing it. I haven't seen half of the two movies that he's directed, but I know just from Pulp Fiction and to a lesser extent his own Killing Zoe that the movie is probably in good hands in the writing department. The production design, the makeup, the creatures, the cinematography, all of these look phenomenal. It even has fucking Boromir running around empty, dusty places and shouting for people. How many movies can claim to have Boromir, let alone Boromir running around shouting for people in empty, dusty places? It's based on my second favorite game series of all time, mainly because I don't get treated like a dumbass by it. It's smart. It's imaginative. It's disturbing. It's near goddamn inexplicable. I know all movies made out of games suck, but that's because the games mostly weren't worth making into movies in the first place. Maybe Resident Evil could have been good if they had stuck with George Fucking A Romero as the director. I read his script. It has a dying zombie horse getting shot in the face in the first ten pages. How many movies have that in the first few minutes? Not many. Instead they went with Paul Worthless Shit Anderson, who decided to make a feature length Sprite commercial with an occasional shot of Milla Jovovich's beaver (a very overrated beaver, too) and creepy-long nipples, and no horses at all, let alone dying zombie horses being shot in the face. But this movie, this Silent Hill, it looks good. It looks better than even the recent hard-R horror crop, even, which has been pretty awesome. April 21st cannot come any sooner, and that's the problem.
So yesterday I was watching some stuff from The Netflix and I saw this picture called Violent Cop from Takeshi Kitano. If you don't know who Kitano is, then tough. Watching a Kitano movie is like combining the experience of watching a Jarmusch movie and a Tarantino movie. On one hand, it's slow, full of long takes of people doing very little, and on the other hand every ten or fifteen minutes someone dies in a horrible way. I hate simplifying Tarantino as a "violent" director, personally, because look at the violence in Goodfellas or Casino and then look at the violence in Reservoir Dogs or Pulp Fiction--Scorcese is more violent than Tarantino. Yet, I don't think Scorcese is classified as a "violent" director, more as a director who makes movies that have violence in them. Or maybe he was before The Aviator and I just wasn't paying attention. And people say Kill Bill is so violent, but the violent parts people talk about are just intentionally campy homages to samurai flicks. But I'm sidetracked. Basically Violent Cop is about a cop who is violent. He likes beating the living shit out of everyone. So he does a lot of this. Mostly he just punches and kicks people instead of shooting them, because Takeshi Kitano is mostly too badass to bother shooting people. Some people get shot later on, but mostly it's Takeshi Kitano beating the living shit out of everyone. There are some other "good guy" characters that he doesn't beat the living shit out of, but they're barely important. Mostly it's about Kitano slapping the crap out of people. Yes, sometimes he slaps people. That doesn't sound very badass in theory, but he slaps this one guy, hard, in the face for five minutes straight, and if that isn't badass, I don't know what is. There's a plot, but it's pretty typical. The real stars of the movie are Kitano the director and Kitano the actor, and Kitano the director, debuting with this flick (it originally came out over in Japan in '89), is really, really good. The cinematography, editing, and all that shit is great. Kitano the actor simultaneously manages to be expressionless and badass, and you know some motherfucker is badass when his face barely moves. A lot of people say this movie is really violent, but with the exception of a few choice moments, it wasn't too bad. (by "bad", I mean stop your grinnin' and drop your linen awesome) There is one bit where a guy gets his head cracked open with one swing from a bat, which struck me as being a little exaggerated but it was nice to watch if I was into that sort of thing in some sort of alternate dimension where I thought stuff like that was hot. It ends in the usual Kitano gangster-flick fashion, which means that everyone important dies and the credits roll with you considering offing yourself, but in a good way. The movie does end with this weird freeze frame that I don't quite understand, but maybe because it was because I was distracted by outside factors while I was watching the movie. Anyway, it was pretty good, not my favorite film from Kitano, which might be either Zatoichi or Brother, the latter of which is seriously flawed but extremely enjoyable. The movie I saw before on The Netflix was The Killing, by The Kubrick, back when he was in his pupa stage. While I don't think the movie has aged very well, because some of the dialogue and supporting characters are weak, it does have Sterling Hayden, and that has to count for something. Maybe I'm not stating how good this movie is clearly enough. It's got possibly the first truly nonlinear time structure. Unfortunately, when everything is happening has to be announced as the scene starts by what sounds like the narrator from Dragnet, which is really corny and dated. I still really liked it in spite of a few nitpicks here and there because it's just so damn good. Everything is all ironic and shit, and the ending is wonderful. It's also really short, so even people who didn't like The Kubrick when he became God and owned everyone else who will ever live's asses starting somewhere in between Dr.Strangelove and 2001 will probably like this one. One thing I found somewhat jarring was the fact that they drop the N-bomb in this. I know it was the 50's, but most of the movies from that time lived in a racism free bubble where everyone was white and fighting off invading aliens. And to prove that The Kubrick was an alright cat even back then, the guy who says it gets shot thirty seconds later for being a racist douchebag. Anyway, good flick. So that's pretty much all I've got to say. |
|
0 Comments | |
|


