ROTTEN TOMATOES: Hunter H.'s Review of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

Groups
| Forums

Hunter H. Last Login: 11/18/09

Hunter H.

Block This User

Movie Match

Critics

92%

Top Critics

75%

Community

92%

Friends

92%

Profile Stats

Total Profile Views:: 353

Profile Views Last 30 Days:: 234

Total Views

Ratings:: 50

Reviews:: 214

Lists:: 8

Blog:: 23

Views last 30 days

Ratings:: 36

Reviews:: 134

Lists:: 2

Blog:: 16

About

Member Since: October 2009
Movie Character You Most Identify With: Zach Braff's character in Garden State
Favorite Line From A Movie: It has Electrolytes
Favorite Scene From A Movie: Quint's speech about the Indianapolis in Jaws.
Favorite Movie: Jaws
Favorite Actor: Seth Rogen
Favorite Director: Steven Spielberg
Favorite Genre: Comedies
Favorite Critic: Roger Ebert
Best Movie Seat: middle
When I'm not watching movies, I'm...: reading/writing
Fresh or Rotten: Fresh

Reviews Snapshot

Reviews Written:: 12

Highest Voted
Lowest Voted

The Last King of Scotland (2006)

+1

The Last King of Scotland (2006)

100%

Wow. The Last King Scotland is a unflinching tale of genocide. Forest Whitaker give a very intense performance. Amin is extremely bi-polar. One minute he'll be... More

Reviews

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 Review

Movie Reviews Table
One Sheet	Reviews

	Votes +1 +1 / -0 thumb up thumb down Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (2008) Genre: Education/General Interest 10% 10% compare Agrees With.... Critics: Check Top Critics: Check Community: Check Friends: N/A Favorites: N/A Posted on 10/16/09 at 10:09 PM This movie is horrible. The film takes skepticism into creationism propaganda. It is as if they want you to pity the subject, but respect it. The film just repeats the same idea throughout making the film tedious. There is a ton of cherry-picking; too bad Ben Stein chose crap flavored pretzels. The film argues that intelligent design is not religious, but that creation of life was "intelligently" made. Yes, that sentence is contradictory but that is what the film is arguing. Stein is just interviewing skeptics and manipulating their stand points to get what he wants. His attempts as humor are not funny and everything he did on "Win Ben Steins Money" is now in void. Stein bullies Richard Dawkins because Dawkins is more blunt about his views and Stein cannot stand for Dawkins inability to hear the other side out. Instead of actually interviewing him he just rips of another interview and manipulates it so he sounds crazy, but fails at that too. This film isn't impartial it's a pitiful attempt to to defend an idea that has no evidence. Darwin's theory may have it's discrepancies but at least it provides more proof than the lackluster of creationism. 0 Comments \| Post a Comment \| Send This \| Report Abuse

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 Review

About| Site Map| Help| RT To Go| Contact Us| Critics Submission| Linking to RT| Licensing| Movie List| Celebs List| Newsletter

IGN.com | GameSpy | Comrade | Arena | FilePlanet | GameSpy Technology
TeamXbox | Planets | Vaults | VE3D | CheatsCodesGuides | GameStats | GamerMetrics
AskMen.com | Rotten Tomatoes | Direct2Drive | Green Pixels

By continuing past this page, and by the continued use of this site, you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.

Copyright 1998-2009, IGN Entertainment, Inc. About IGN | Support | Advertise | Privacy Policy | User Agreement |

IGN's enterprise databases running Oracle, SQL and MySQL are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA

Certain product data ©1995-present Muze, Inc. For personal use only. All rights reserved.